4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

7-9 psi Vortech Kit??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2009, 03:07 PM
  #11  
grogan
3rd Gear Member
 
grogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: maryland
Posts: 811
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
Either you're an auto or your tuner sucks bollocks? 10lbs, I/C and only 359???
yea im in an automatic with 3k stall
grogan is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 04:41 PM
  #12  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Originally Posted by grogan
yea im in an automatic with 3k stall
Good to know. Posting Hp numbers with a stall is kind of misleading. Stalls reak havoc on dynos.
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 06:06 PM
  #13  
texas_stang02
3rd Gear Member
 
texas_stang02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 732
Default

Originally Posted by jvog
on a 3.33 pulley, o/r h pipe, and catback my intercooled setup made 369 rwhp. You are probably lookin at around 350ish maybe. On a side note its my 1000th post yay
sounds about right. i'm running the aftercooled setup with a 3.33 pulley, stock mid-pipe, Steeda cat-back and on an uber-conservative tune i'm making 348 rwhp. i talked with my tuner and sometime next month i'm swapping to an o/r mid-pipe and he said he'd have no problem getting me up to 380 rwhp.
texas_stang02 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 10:07 PM
  #14  
jRock617
2nd Gear Member
 
jRock617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
Either you're an auto or your tuner sucks bollocks? 10lbs, I/C and only 359???
yeah thats what i was thinking too. he's either an auto or he did not have any supporting fuel/air mods (MAF, big enough injectors, fuel pump, etc). or it was a VERY conservative tune.
jRock617 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 11:24 PM
  #15  
jvog
5th Gear Member
 
jvog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 2,825
Default

Originally Posted by texas_stang02
sounds about right. i'm running the aftercooled setup with a 3.33 pulley, stock mid-pipe, Steeda cat-back and on an uber-conservative tune i'm making 348 rwhp. i talked with my tuner and sometime next month i'm swapping to an o/r mid-pipe and he said he'd have no problem getting me up to 380 rwhp.
32 rwhp from an o/r mid pipe? Riiiight. Unless this next tune isnt going to be as conservative, I don't see that happeneing
jvog is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 06:12 AM
  #16  
jivepepper
3rd Gear Member
 
jivepepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 563
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang3GT07
What made you go with the non-intercooled kit?
Price probably. That's what I did at first.

I run a 3" pulley on my S-trim and made 598 lol. Did you get a Si trim?
jivepepper is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 10:03 AM
  #17  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Originally Posted by jivepepper
Price probably. That's what I did at first.

I run a 3" pulley on my S-trim and made 598 lol. Did you get a Si trim?
Aren't youforgetting about your little Overdrive Ballancer? lol
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 11:00 AM
  #18  
jivepepper
3rd Gear Member
 
jivepepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 563
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
Aren't youforgetting about your little Overdrive Ballancer? lol
Hmmmmmmmmm prehaps?
jivepepper is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
12-27-2021 08:09 PM
TCStangerv6
Street/Strip
12
10-11-2015 05:57 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
09-30-2015 03:48 AM



Quick Reply: 7-9 psi Vortech Kit??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.