Full Length vs. Long Tube
06-24-2005, 11:31 AM
#11
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,967
RE: Full Length vs. Long Tube
ORIGINAL: Obselite
...i am a ways off, but the 2.2 is on its way...now i have to worry about VT getting my internals sent to me in 4-6 wks since I had to get custom 23 cc dish pistons
the cams are comin too, and the heads will be done when i have all installed. I'd say 700-750 is more expected, but with a few more odds and ends i'll be up there, eventually.
you like to talk a lot of **** dont you?
...i am a ways off, but the 2.2 is on its way...now i have to worry about VT getting my internals sent to me in 4-6 wks since I had to get custom 23 cc dish pistons
the cams are comin too, and the heads will be done when i have all installed. I'd say 700-750 is more expected, but with a few more odds and ends i'll be up there, eventually.
you like to talk a lot of **** dont you?
06-24-2005, 04:18 PM
#14
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 862
RE: Full Length vs. Long Tube
yeah i know..but 825 at the crank will be about 750-775 at the wheels.
hopefully i can get a really good tune and make it, otherwise ill have to get a small shot of giggle gas.
hopefully i can get a really good tune and make it, otherwise ill have to get a small shot of giggle gas.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
10-22-2015 11:55 PM
