Is This Right
07-12-2005, 12:42 PM
#1
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 90
Is This Right
i just took my car to get tuned on the dyno ( Mustang Dynometer) and i started with a base line of 218HP and 262ft-lbs of torque on my 2001 Auto GT with the mods in my signature with 11 to 1 air to fuel ratio. At the end of the tuning with the predator i ended up with 223HP and 256ft-lbs of torque with a 14 to 1 air to fuel ratio. i dont think this is right but mabe i am just wanting to much. He did say on a dyno Jet that I would have probably had more like 243-245 HP.look below and tell me if this seems right or if i should have someone else tune it. the first one the red one was after he was done tuning. The second on in the Green was the baseline before anything was done.
[IMG]local://upfiles/15117/0A18958B64294B088715A13DCB1953A3.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/15117/0A18958B64294B088715A13DCB1953A3.jpg[/IMG]
07-12-2005, 12:59 PM
#2
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 9,172
RE: Is This Right
Thats a decent number for a Mustang dyno. Your AFR is a little rich. You need to try and get it between 13.0 and 13.5 on a NA application. 
EDIT: Just noticed that you now have a 14.0 AFR with the pred. tune. Thats okay but 13.0 to 13.5 is a little safer. I had all the mods you had + a densecharger CAI and timing adjusted through a chip and I dyno'd on a dyno jet at 276 and 325 and after the 4.10's I dyno'd at 260 and 300 even.
EDIT: Just noticed that you now have a 14.0 AFR with the pred. tune. Thats okay but 13.0 to 13.5 is a little safer. I had all the mods you had + a densecharger CAI and timing adjusted through a chip and I dyno'd on a dyno jet at 276 and 325 and after the 4.10's I dyno'd at 260 and 300 even.
07-12-2005, 02:09 PM
#3
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 505
RE: Is This Right
ORIGINAL: jdaniel
Thats a decent number for a Mustang dyno. Your AFR is a little rich. You need to try and get it between 13.0 and 13.5 on a NA application.
EDIT: Just noticed that you now have a 14.0 AFR with the pred. tune. Thats okay but 13.0 to 13.5 is a little safer. I had all the mods you had + a densecharger CAI and timing adjusted through a chip and I dyno'd on a dyno jet at 276 and 325 and after the 4.10's I dyno'd at 260 and 300 even.
Thats a decent number for a Mustang dyno. Your AFR is a little rich. You need to try and get it between 13.0 and 13.5 on a NA application.
EDIT: Just noticed that you now have a 14.0 AFR with the pred. tune. Thats okay but 13.0 to 13.5 is a little safer. I had all the mods you had + a densecharger CAI and timing adjusted through a chip and I dyno'd on a dyno jet at 276 and 325 and after the 4.10's I dyno'd at 260 and 300 even.
07-12-2005, 04:03 PM
#5
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 3,645
RE: Is This Right
ORIGINAL: jdaniel
Yeah. The power is still there but when you add steeper gears you dyno a little less. I cant remember the exact explanation.
Yeah. The power is still there but when you add steeper gears you dyno a little less. I cant remember the exact explanation.
07-12-2005, 04:29 PM
#8
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 12.59@107mph
Posts: 592
RE: Is This Right
ORIGINAL: jdl01gt
i just took my car to get tuned on the dyno ( Mustang Dynometer) and i started with a base line of 218HP and 262ft-lbs of torque on my 2001 Auto GT with the mods in my signature with 11 to 1 air to fuel ratio. At the end of the tuning with the predator i ended up with 223HP and 256ft-lbs of torque with a 14 to 1 air to fuel ratio. i dont think this is right but mabe i am just wanting to much. He did say on a dyno Jet that I would have probably had more like 243-245 HP.look below and tell me if this seems right or if i should have someone else tune it. the first one the red one was after he was done tuning. The second on in the Green was the baseline before anything was done.
[IMG]local://upfiles/15117/0A18958B64294B088715A13DCB1953A3.jpg[/IMG]
i just took my car to get tuned on the dyno ( Mustang Dynometer) and i started with a base line of 218HP and 262ft-lbs of torque on my 2001 Auto GT with the mods in my signature with 11 to 1 air to fuel ratio. At the end of the tuning with the predator i ended up with 223HP and 256ft-lbs of torque with a 14 to 1 air to fuel ratio. i dont think this is right but mabe i am just wanting to much. He did say on a dyno Jet that I would have probably had more like 243-245 HP.look below and tell me if this seems right or if i should have someone else tune it. the first one the red one was after he was done tuning. The second on in the Green was the baseline before anything was done.
[IMG]local://upfiles/15117/0A18958B64294B088715A13DCB1953A3.jpg[/IMG]
07-12-2005, 04:32 PM
#9
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,967
07-12-2005, 08:29 PM
#10
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: Is This Right
ORIGINAL: jdaniel
Thats a decent number for a Mustang dyno. Your AFR is a little rich. You need to try and get it between 13.0 and 13.5 on a NA application.
EDIT: Just noticed that you now have a 14.0 AFR with the pred. tune. Thats okay but 13.0 to 13.5 is a little safer. I had all the mods you had + a densecharger CAI and timing adjusted through a chip and I dyno'd on a dyno jet at 276 and 325 and after the 4.10's I dyno'd at 260 and 300 even.
Thats a decent number for a Mustang dyno. Your AFR is a little rich. You need to try and get it between 13.0 and 13.5 on a NA application.
EDIT: Just noticed that you now have a 14.0 AFR with the pred. tune. Thats okay but 13.0 to 13.5 is a little safer. I had all the mods you had + a densecharger CAI and timing adjusted through a chip and I dyno'd on a dyno jet at 276 and 325 and after the 4.10's I dyno'd at 260 and 300 even.
Also, I find it extremly hard to belive you lost 25 FT/Lb going from 3.27s to 4.10s, that just doesn't make since. Sure you lose a little power, but that is a crapton.
Something is screwed up or was with the dyno you used. And in any case 325 FT/Lb is just unreal in a bolt on only GT. 370 FT/LB at the crank????