4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Secret sauce TR3650= grind and notchy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2011, 05:28 PM
  #11  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by 01GTDropTop
So now it's 3 qts and 6 oz? Jumped from 4 qts down to 3 qts/6 oz?

I have a 700 mile road trip ahead of me, I need to know the PROPER fill level. I don't want to be stranded between Kansas and Houston.
It is 3.0L or 3.17qt per this TSB from Ford. The recommended fill was lowered to reduce hydrostatic locking of the shift rod detents and the gears and synchros...

You could be +/- 1/2qt from that amount and drive 700 miles at reasonable loads and speeds with no problems--oil levels in automobiles (engine/tranny/differential) are really not all that critical--+/- 15% is fine...

Last edited by cliffyk; 12-05-2011 at 05:31 PM.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-05-2011, 05:31 PM
  #12  
jrp1588
2nd Gear Member
 
jrp1588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 414
Default

My bad, I was just going off the above post and didn't bother to do the unit conversion, and couldn't remember what the old fill level was. *slinks off into corner and feels dumb*
jrp1588 is offline  
Old 12-05-2011, 05:38 PM
  #13  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

The '02 and '03 owner's manuals say 3.8L (4.0qt), the '04 manual says 3.7L (3.9qt); the TSB 3.0L (3.2qt).

I have run my '03 with 3.2qt for 100k miles now with no issues except smoother shifting than when I got it with 30k miles and what was most likely the factory 3.8L fill.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-06-2011, 12:19 AM
  #14  
zero2005
4th Gear Member
 
zero2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ / MA
Posts: 1,337
Default

I used to swear by RP both before, and after having my 3650 rebuilt, and while it was great (maybe a placebo effect?), on a recommendation i saw on the forum and because RP was a pain to get, i swapped to M1 ATF and i noticed it was noticeably smoother, not only on the shift, but on my wallet too!
zero2005 is offline  
Old 12-06-2011, 03:43 PM
  #15  
trailor
3rd Gear Member
 
trailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOLA
Posts: 665
Default

Mobil1 ATF is definitely superior. Filled mine to almost 3.2qts exactly and haven't had a problem since.

Another recommended product to solve virtually all your problems is a switch to the MGW short throw shifter -- definitely a "must have" to eliminate ALL notchiness of these specific TR3650's. The 04's got a slight improvement, while the 05+ got even more. 2001-03 seemed to be the more "experimental" years... The next solution to fix everything would be to get the TSB-recommended rebuild kit, which is hardly justifiable based on the price for the parts and labor.

Last edited by trailor; 12-06-2011 at 03:46 PM.
trailor is offline  
Old 12-06-2011, 04:05 PM
  #16  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

My experience has been that short throw shifters make any "notchiness" (which is in the transmission) more noticeable as they increase the amount of force required to move the lever between gears. The increase in required force being the payoff for the shorter throw--that's just plain ol' laws of mechanical advantage in action--read more about STS's here.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-06-2011, 04:20 PM
  #17  
Repzard
4th Gear Member
 
Repzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: sttesuhcaxaT (The State you love to hate)
Posts: 1,360
Default

Use M1 ATF and be done with it.
Why use something else not made for the tranny?

I use M1 ATF in my T45's and its like a new tranny.
Shift nice and smooth with no grinding.
Repzard is offline  
Old 12-06-2011, 04:25 PM
  #18  
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
My experience has been that short throw shifters make any "notchiness" (which is in the transmission) more noticeable as they increase the amount of force required to move the lever between gears. The increase in required force being the payoff for the shorter throw--that's just plain ol' laws of mechanical advantage in action--read more about STS's here.
This is exactly right!
I would still suggest upgrading to a STS, but don't expect it to SMOOTH out the notchy feeling. The MGW will make it "feel" more notchy(personal experience).
TRUEBLUE3934 is offline  
Old 12-06-2011, 09:14 PM
  #19  
trailor
3rd Gear Member
 
trailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOLA
Posts: 665
Default

perhaps i misrepresented the term "notchy." i was describing the feeling when, with the stock shifter, i would feel several "grooves" of sorts when going into second and third gear. they were very unpredictable, and made shifting a real pain. that has gone away with the MGW. shifting now feels, although "notchy" i suppose, very deliberate.
trailor is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 05:35 AM
  #20  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by trailor
perhaps i misrepresented the term "notchy." i was describing the feeling when, with the stock shifter, i would feel several "grooves" of sorts when going into second and third gear. they were very unpredictable, and made shifting a real pain. that has gone away with the MGW. shifting now feels, although "notchy" i suppose, very deliberate.
Ah, now better I understand. That's part of what I describe as "monkey-motion" in the stock shifter. The rubber NVH isolation makes it jump awkwardly and unpredictably over the shift rod detents, and into gear.

With the MGW the notches are still there but shifting through them is smooth and predictable--like a well-tuned rifle bolt...
cliffyk is offline  


Quick Reply: Secret sauce TR3650= grind and notchy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.