4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Rear sway bar question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2012, 04:39 PM
  #1  
trailor
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
trailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOLA
Posts: 665
Default Rear sway bar question

Last week I installed UPR Chrome Moly Single Adjustable Urethane Lower Control Arms and had quite a time reinstalling the rear sway bar. In fact, it took me and two other guys, all of which frequent the gym and are fairly strong, to get it back into position. Now I am on to the next project: MM Panhard Bar and Torque Arm...

While I am only near the beginning of the Panhard Bar install, I am already having trouble with this sway bar. I was instructed to remove only the drivers side pivot bolt for the LCA in order to remove the spring. Well I couldn't get enough tension off the spring without removing the pivot bolt off the passenger side LCA as well. Now I am trying to reinstall the LCA pivot bolts on both sides and hardly have any room to maneuver bc of this damned rear sway bar.

My question is, what are the drawbacks to removing this sucker (rear sway bar) completely? My end goal for this car is to have a grippy 1/4mile runner that isn't a joke around turns, but have no intentions of auto-X, just some weekend driving and toying around when not at the track. Will my grip at the drag strip suffer from its removal? Will I have an unpredictable daily driver on everyday turns? Or will the PHB and TA compensate enough for the lack of a rear sway bar??

THANKS!
trailor is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:26 PM
  #2  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

It's a stabilizer or anti-roll bar, not a sway bar (sway is what pendulums, and tall buildings in the wind, and drunken drivers trying to touch their nose do)...

Nomenclature aside, get rid of it. For you intended use and with your rear-end upgrades it will do little to nothing for your--except be a PITA to work around..

Last edited by cliffyk; 01-09-2012 at 06:28 PM.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:58 PM
  #3  
BLKSTANGER
2nd Gear Member
 
BLKSTANGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 209
Default

My rear sway bar broke a few months ago. I took it off till I could get another one. I have to tell you I can't tell it's gone at all. I drive some curvy roads at times and don't miss it at all.
BLKSTANGER is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 07:25 PM
  #4  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

<pet_peeve[14], skip="if easily offended">

I do not mean to be a dick about this (despite the fact that I am good at it) however it is NOT a sway bar. I realise this is what "most/many" people call it, and what most of the vendors call it so as to cater to the "most/many" that call them that--however if you ever have a discussion with an automotive engineer or serious suspension tuner they will judge your "knowing what the heck you are talking about" by your using the correct term.

Stabilizer or anti-roll bar...

</pet_peeve[14]>
cliffyk is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 08:13 PM
  #5  
djoneill
1st Gear Member
 
djoneill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ole Virginny
Posts: 96
Default

The rear stabilizer balances the car in a corner. Removing the rear bar from a car equipped with one from the factory will result in pronounced understeer.

Cars delivered w/o rear bars typically have smaller front bars to lessen the understeer.
djoneill is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 09:38 PM
  #6  
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Default

The above post is correct!!!
Removal of the rear anti-roll bar will result in a car that will understeer, or push in corners. If handling is of any concern to you, DON'T remove the rear bar. Your other suspension mods do NOT compensate for the absence of the rear bar. The front and rear bars are intended to work together to provide a decent balance of grip while cornering. There is NO benefit to removing the rear bar, so you should plan to keep it on the car.
TRUEBLUE3934 is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 10:37 AM
  #7  
trailor
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
trailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOLA
Posts: 665
Default

ok so the front and rear anti-roll bars work together... what if i already removed the front one almost a year ago, and noticed no difference whatsoever??

i think i will take cliff's advice and just leave the SOB off of it. Jazzer, any input??

Last edited by trailor; 01-10-2012 at 12:31 PM.
trailor is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 01:34 PM
  #8  
brent22
2nd Gear Member
 
brent22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 179
Default

They work together, if you already removed the front one just leave the back on off.
brent22 is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 04:39 PM
  #9  
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Default

Actually, the springs and bars are tuned to work together(or bars tuned to work in conjunction with the springs).
If you really didn't feel any difference when you removed the front bar... don't worry about any suspension mods at all. A car missing the front bar on a car equipped with a set of bars will absolutely handle like crap. If that feels OK, I wouldn't waste a nickel on suspension mods.
The expense of a PHB and TA will be a waste for you.

JAZZER,
Please chime in on the bars.

Last edited by TRUEBLUE3934; 01-10-2012 at 04:42 PM.
TRUEBLUE3934 is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:53 PM
  #10  
Jazzer The Cat
Retired Moderator
 
Jazzer The Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 9,235
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
<pet_peeve[14], skip="if easily offended">

I do not mean to be a dick about this (despite the fact that I am good at it) however it is NOT a sway bar. I realise this is what "most/many" people call it, and what most of the vendors call it so as to cater to the "most/many" that call them that--however if you ever have a discussion with an automotive engineer or serious suspension tuner they will judge your "knowing what the heck you are talking about" by your using the correct term.

Stabilizer or anti-roll bar...

</pet_peeve[14]>
To go the next step, an "anti-roll" bar is often considered exactly that... and allows NO body roll. This is a somewhat common installation for a full-time 1/4 mile only ride and is NOT a good thing on the street. This being said, a sway-bar, anti-roll or stabilizer bar is perfectly acceptable as a description and even the God of all interwebz knowledge says so

Trailer and TRUE.... I am with what many others are saying and to leave the rear bar on for the street. The sway-bar is a tuning device and designed to address relatively small amounts of understeer/oversteer. Removing one or the other, can create a pretty serious imbalance in one of these conditions (all else being equal).

Unless you do some research on a properly rated spring to compensate for the lack of a rear bar, I would not recommend you remove the front one. I see no advantage to removing the rear one, for either DD or 1/4 mile use.

Jazzer

Last edited by Jazzer The Cat; 01-10-2012 at 07:56 PM.
Jazzer The Cat is offline  


Quick Reply: Rear sway bar question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.