4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Do Mach springs sit lower than the GT springs?

Old 02-06-2012, 04:51 PM
  #11  
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Default

LOL Yes, only the factories speak in terms of flywheel HP.
That is true about not being able to measure flywheel HP, but if his car is a manual trans, he can just multiply his rwhp figure by 1.15 to get a pretty good flywheel figure(if that is really important to him).

So... 300 flywheel HP is approximately 255rwhp, and 350 flywheel HP is approximately 298rwhp. Those figures are more probable with the mods he is talking about.
TRUEBLUE3934 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:19 AM
  #12  
sonicx
speed'n
 
sonicx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 2,248
Default

Mach 1 Springs, Bullitt Springs, Ford C Rated Springs .... really all the same when it comes down to brass tacks. (Just as a reference)
sonicx is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fcarpio
Suspension
7
11-16-2018 10:35 AM
robcy
Suspension
1
10-27-2015 11:14 PM
Gene K
S197 Handling Section
1
10-21-2015 11:37 PM
Big Al's 03
Mach 1 Section
4
09-21-2015 07:59 AM
robjh22
Suspension
0
09-08-2015 12:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Do Mach springs sit lower than the GT springs?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.