4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

2002 GT - Do they all run rough? Too Rich?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2012, 12:09 AM
  #1  
BornToFord
Thread Starter
 
BornToFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10
Default 2002 GT - Do they all run rough? Too Rich?

I've been working on my 2002 GT with 93k miles to get it running well enough to pass emissions here in TN. Only mods are a K&N CAI and older Magnaflow exhaust. It was my son's car and I never thought it ran right. The engine is in very good shape, and after replacing the coil packs, PCV valve, and vacuum hoses, cleaning the MAF and IAC, it runs pretty well. It runs awesome before it hits full operating temp. However, after it warms up it runs a bit rough.

I took it to the dealer and had them run diagnostics. The mechanic said it was running perfectly and that these cars just run on the rough side. Is this true?

I have an SCT TSX tuner and have flashed the performance tune to try it out, but am running the stock tune now.

I also have a P1000 code that I need to get rid of. I have put about 60 miles on it since resetting the ECU, and it's still there. Any ideas how to get rid of it?

Thanks, Andy
BornToFord is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 01:28 AM
  #2  
FormlessGT
1st Gear Member
 
FormlessGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 106
Default

I also have a 2002 GT. From my experience up to 113,000 miles, mine runs smooth.

Last edited by FormlessGT; 12-01-2012 at 01:59 AM.
FormlessGT is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 11:45 AM
  #3  
BornToFord
Thread Starter
 
BornToFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10
Default

Yeah, the mechanic said the air/fuel ratio was about 11.5 to 1. That sounds way rich, although he said it was acceptable. I'll bet a good dyno tune would have it running great. It's not terrible, and like I said it runs awesome before it hits full operating temp. As soon as I pass smog I'll get it corrected.

Still need to clear that P1000 code!
BornToFord is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 03:47 PM
  #4  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

If the front O² sensors are failing they can still output sufficient voltage and switch as they should, however when the PCM switches to closed loop mode (after the engine warms up over 175° or so) the low output will be interpreted as the AFR being lean. The PCM will compensate by adding fuel until the failing sensors report a proper AFR of 14.7:1 (the actual process is a bit more complex than this).

This adding (or subtracting) of fuel is called the Short Term Fuel Trim (STFT), and as long as it stays between -25% and +25% the PCM will not throw a trouble code.

So the first thing I would do would be to data log a cycle from start-up to engine hot and see what the STFTs (there's one for each bank) do. If they push up into the 15%+ range when the engine is hot then the front O² sensors are almost certainly on their way out. At 93k miles this would not be unusual.

One last comment, if the engine was running 11.5:1 at idle or under normal loads (I.e. not 70% or more throttle) then it is not acceptable nor normal--find a new mechanic. In closed loop it should cycle between 14.4:1 and 15.0:1 one to 3 times per second, maintaining an average of 14.7:1.

The P1000 code is being thrown because the OBD2 I/M (Inspection/Maintenance) readiness tests have not been completed. Their completion does require some specific conditions, here is a description of the Drive Cycles needed to force the I/M tests to run...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 05:54 PM
  #5  
1slow67
ROTM Moderator
 
1slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 8,146
Default

Tennessee has emissions testing?
1slow67 is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 06:53 PM
  #6  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow67
Tennessee has emissions testing?
Yup, Hamilton, Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson and Wilson Counties...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 09:12 PM
  #7  
BornToFord
Thread Starter
 
BornToFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow67
Tennessee has emissions testing?
Some counties do. It's a good way to make money.

Thanks Cliff, I have been checking out your posts for a while. You are the main reason I signed up and posted.

I forgot to mention that the car was running poorly when I got it, and the first thing I did was replace the O2 sensors with NTK's based on your posts. I believe one sensor was worse than the other as it was black and the other was light brown. The plugs looked like one bank was running richer as well.

Fuel trims are running from .8 at start up, then drops to .65 for a short time, the up to around 1.05 at max when at full operating temps. This is off the Datalog Graph read off the TSX tuner module. I'm not sure how that relates to percentage.

I did replace my thermostat after this logging. I was running about 180 deg on the highway as read off the ECU, and I run about 190-195 deg with the new thermostat. Both are 195 degree versions.
BornToFord is offline  
Old 12-04-2012, 09:26 PM
  #8  
BornToFord
Thread Starter
 
BornToFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10
Default

Bump

Thanks Cliff, I have been checking out your posts for a while. You are the main reason I signed up and posted.

I forgot to mention that the car was running poorly when I got it, and the first thing I did was replace the O2 sensors with NTK's based on your posts. I believe one sensor was worse than the other as it was black and the other was light brown. The plugs looked like one bank was running richer as well.

Fuel trims are running from .8 at start up, then drops to .65 for a short time, the up to around 1.05 at max when at full operating temps. This is off the Datalog Graph read off the TSX tuner module. I'm not sure how that relates to percentage.

I did replace my thermostat after this logging. I was running about 180 deg on the highway as read off the ECU, and I run about 190-195 deg with the new thermostat. Both are 195 degree versions.
BornToFord is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jb145700
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
9
08-21-2022 06:37 AM
2007StangV6
2005-2014 Mustangs
30
01-28-2016 06:09 PM
musnicki
Classic Mustang General Discussion
8
09-23-2015 07:11 AM
zanemoseley
2005-2014 Mustangs
6
09-06-2015 12:58 PM



Quick Reply: 2002 GT - Do they all run rough? Too Rich?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.