dynoed the stang today!
#51
RE: dynoed the stang today!
ORIGINAL: mcmmotorsports
Did you ever find it strange that our numbers (both PSI and HP) are lower than the V2's?
I wish I would've known this before. I may not have been stressing so much recently about my low #'s
Did you ever find it strange that our numbers (both PSI and HP) are lower than the V2's?
I wish I would've known this before. I may not have been stressing so much recently about my low #'s
#52
RE: dynoed the stang today!
No, I do not have a T/B or Plenum
All of my mods are listed on my website:
http://www.mcmmotorsports.com
Click on the Mustang Link.
Haven't updated my sig here yet.
All of my mods are listed on my website:
http://www.mcmmotorsports.com
Click on the Mustang Link.
Haven't updated my sig here yet.
#53
RE: dynoed the stang today!
I notice the lighting airmass. Isn't that a 90mm? Some guys may say I'm wrong but the guy from the dyno I work with says that to big a airmass does not necessary help. And what are the numbers on the fuelpump? 255lph?
#54
RE: dynoed the stang today!
I dyno'd 347hp with a 3.3 pulley with no cooler and no IAT sensor after the blower.I put the IAT sensor and a cooler on and got over 400hp. If you don't have an IAT after the blower the car really can't be tuned to it's full potential with or without a cooler because the tuner can only guess what to set the timing. I was told that a 3.6 and a 3.3 pulley would make close to the same hp without a cooler because you would have to retard timing with the extra boost making that extra boost detrimental. The cooler and IAT added 60 hp. The V1 is less efficient and will create more heat also decreasing overall HP. Get a cooler if you don't have one. I know they are expensive and I was pissed that I had to get one but I'm glad I did.
#55
RE: dynoed the stang today!
ORIGINAL: mcmmotorsports
No, I do not have a T/B or Plenum
All of my mods are listed on my website:
http://www.mcmmotorsports.com
Click on the Mustang Link.
Haven't updated my sig here yet.
No, I do not have a T/B or Plenum
All of my mods are listed on my website:
http://www.mcmmotorsports.com
Click on the Mustang Link.
Haven't updated my sig here yet.
#57
RE: dynoed the stang today!
ORIGINAL: trbuddy
And by the way, really nice looking car!
And by the way, really nice looking car!
ORIGINAL: trbuddy
I notice the lighting airmass. Isn't that a 90mm? Some guys may say I'm wrong but the guy from the dyno I work with says that to big a airmass does not necessary help. And what are the numbers on the fuelpump? 255lph?
I notice the lighting airmass. Isn't that a 90mm? Some guys may say I'm wrong but the guy from the dyno I work with says that to big a airmass does not necessary help. And what are the numbers on the fuelpump? 255lph?
#58
RE: dynoed the stang today!
ORIGINAL: mcmmotorsports
Thank you
This is the EXACT same setup that is sold through Modular Powerhouse as a Mongoose kit. It has been proven.
ORIGINAL: trbuddy
And by the way, really nice looking car!
And by the way, really nice looking car!
ORIGINAL: trbuddy
I notice the lighting airmass. Isn't that a 90mm? Some guys may say I'm wrong but the guy from the dyno I work with says that to big a airmass does not necessary help. And what are the numbers on the fuelpump? 255lph?
I notice the lighting airmass. Isn't that a 90mm? Some guys may say I'm wrong but the guy from the dyno I work with says that to big a airmass does not necessary help. And what are the numbers on the fuelpump? 255lph?
#59
RE: dynoed the stang today!
ORIGINAL: mcmmotorsports
Thank you
This is the EXACT same setup that is sold through Modular Powerhouse as a Mongoose kit. It has been proven.
ORIGINAL: trbuddy
And by the way, really nice looking car!
And by the way, really nice looking car!
ORIGINAL: trbuddy
I notice the lighting airmass. Isn't that a 90mm? Some guys may say I'm wrong but the guy from the dyno I work with says that to big a airmass does not necessary help. And what are the numbers on the fuelpump? 255lph?
I notice the lighting airmass. Isn't that a 90mm? Some guys may say I'm wrong but the guy from the dyno I work with says that to big a airmass does not necessary help. And what are the numbers on the fuelpump? 255lph?
Anyway, looking at your mods I didn't see headers. Oversight or just not yet? Odd that your not getting more boost with the smaller pulley. Maybe the belt is slipping some?
#60
RE: dynoed the stang today!
Absoultely NO belt slip. No headers either, probably won't see them or I may, just not 100% sure yet.
Found out that the pulley I need is a 3.2, 3.48 is what came standard on the V-1's.
I will see my 10psi, I AM SURE OF IT.
Found out that the pulley I need is a 3.2, 3.48 is what came standard on the V-1's.
I will see my 10psi, I AM SURE OF IT.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM