4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

why not 3.90's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2005, 01:55 AM
  #11  
JoeyD
3rd Gear Member
 
JoeyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 665
Default RE: why not 3.90's?

Hi fast,
Yes reason many turn away from 3.90's is due to the simple fact that FRRP doesn't make that ratio.
PERSONALLY I would rec. FRRP 4.10's for you. if you have a manny tranny.
I assume you do? but I dont see a SHORT THROW shifter listed in your mod list.
So if you do, I would get 4.10's, big DR's (BFGs are awsome) in the back, and LC arms... short throw shifter ---FOR NOW.
if you have an auto... I would get 4.30's, big DR's, and LC arms... stall converter ---FOR NOW.

you will see the times drop with these mods for sure, good choice.
JoeyD is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:58 AM
  #12  
mustang_montana
4th Gear Member
 
mustang_montana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,907
Default RE: why not 3.90's?

i got 3.90s cause i got a twins crew blower going on VERY SOON so i wanted inbetween 3.73s and 4.10s. if the traction is too bad with the 3.90s ill just deal with it.
mustang_montana is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 04:14 AM
  #13  
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: why not 3.90's?

ORIGINAL: mustang_montana

i got 3.90s cause i got a twins crew blower going on VERY SOON so i wanted inbetween 3.73s and 4.10s. if the traction is too bad with the 3.90s ill just deal with it.
hahaha! IF it's too bad? traction is horrible with a KB or even just the eaton on a cobra with 3.55s. you're doomed! [:-]
nanaki is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 05:37 PM
  #14  
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
JD1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
Default RE: why not 3.90's?

ORIGINAL: freeunit

Why doesnt anyone ever get 3.90's? is it because if your going to get those you might as well just get 4.10's? I think i have a better chance at getting 3.90's than 4.10's because my dad had 4.11's in his chevelle and hated them so i think he might let me get 3.90's is that a bad idea? Any help is appreciated...

Thanks Brian
Your dad did'nt have an overdrive trans in his Chevelle, this is old school thinking at it's best, you cannot compare the two cars like that, there are too many differances. If you have traction problems then you need to dial in the suspension and get better tires.

ORIGINAL: nanaki

hahaha.. get some DRs and you MIGHT. control arms aren't going to give you better traction, they'll help with the hippity hop when you're changing gears though.
Actually they can. Adjustible control arms can let you set up your instant center and pinion angle which can help plant the tires (or if done wrong, unload them)
JD1969 is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 06:12 PM
  #15  
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
mustangman02232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ludlow, Mass
Posts: 15,864
Default RE: why not 3.90's?

the chevelle was a classic, the transmisions all have different gear ratios as well as rear end ratios, if your staying N/A, foxes do 3.73s, SN-95s do 4.10s, and 05-06s (not sure on platform number, but i think its DEW-90) do 4.30s,
mustangman02232 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
7
08-29-2015 06:30 PM
DILO2001GT
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
6
10-13-2005 12:01 PM
BicketyBam
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
20
07-02-2005 01:32 PM
BicketyBam
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
8
06-18-2005 01:57 PM
madmojo20
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
6
11-21-2003 01:40 PM



Quick Reply: why not 3.90's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.