whats better for a 96 gt, used s/c or PI heads ported n polished?
01-06-2006, 03:38 PM
#21
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,450
RE: whats better for a 96 gt, used s/c or PI heads ported n polished?
you guys have to be kidding... you could put heads on after a sc just like you could put a sc on after heads. plenty of stock motors running sc making 350whp.....try doing that with your heads. i would get the sc and get heads down the road if you wish, you will get much more power off the bat.
01-06-2006, 08:18 PM
#22
RE: whats better for a 96 gt, used s/c or PI heads ported n polished?
There was someone on here with a 9psi Powerdyne. I laughed my ***** off b/c he was only making 240rwhp. I must have pee'd myself laughing. I made 261rwhp with NON P&P heads, valve job, but that's about all.
It's a lot easier to do HEADS first, than it is to install the S/C just to take it off to put the heads on.
P.S. There was an article in MM&FF saying that NPI heads weren't so bad, in fact P&P NPI heads outflowed STOCK PI heads.
It's a lot easier to do HEADS first, than it is to install the S/C just to take it off to put the heads on.
P.S. There was an article in MM&FF saying that NPI heads weren't so bad, in fact P&P NPI heads outflowed STOCK PI heads.
01-06-2006, 08:19 PM
#23
RE: whats better for a 96 gt, used s/c or PI heads ported n polished?
ORIGINAL: turbostang21
you guys have to be kidding... you could put heads on after a sc just like you could put a sc on after heads. plenty of stock motors running sc making 350whp.....try doing that with your heads. i would get the sc and get heads down the road if you wish, you will get much more power off the bat.
you guys have to be kidding... you could put heads on after a sc just like you could put a sc on after heads. plenty of stock motors running sc making 350whp.....try doing that with your heads. i would get the sc and get heads down the road if you wish, you will get much more power off the bat.
01-07-2006, 08:44 PM
#25
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 3,689
RE: whats better for a 96 gt, used s/c or PI heads ported n polished?
ORIGINAL: Acer2428
Nothing?
Nothing?
01-07-2006, 09:17 PM
#26
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,450
RE: whats better for a 96 gt, used s/c or PI heads ported n polished?
ORIGINAL: Acer2428
There was someone on here with a 9psi Powerdyne. I laughed my ***** off b/c he was only making 240rwhp. I must have pee'd myself laughing. I made 261rwhp with NON P&P heads, valve job, but that's about all.
It's a lot easier to do HEADS first, than it is to install the S/C just to take it off to put the heads on.
P.S. There was an article in MM&FF saying that NPI heads weren't so bad, in fact P&P NPI heads outflowed STOCK PI heads.
There was someone on here with a 9psi Powerdyne. I laughed my ***** off b/c he was only making 240rwhp. I must have pee'd myself laughing. I made 261rwhp with NON P&P heads, valve job, but that's about all.
It's a lot easier to do HEADS first, than it is to install the S/C just to take it off to put the heads on.
P.S. There was an article in MM&FF saying that NPI heads weren't so bad, in fact P&P NPI heads outflowed STOCK PI heads.
i thought a guy around here made 350+ but i called him as i just noticed you called me on it and he said that was with only a stock bottom (afr heads, intake). then i did a google search and came up empty...it seems 300 would have been more accurate. i apologize for the misinfo. i still say sc first as i assume he will not be buying heads the next week so that shouldn't be too much of an inconvenience. 96stang im not scared of much and i will never be scared to be wrong
01-07-2006, 09:21 PM
#27
RE: whats better for a 96 gt, used s/c or PI heads ported n polished?
ORIGINAL: turbostang21
i was wrong. its not the first and it probably won't be the last i thought a guy around here made 350+ but i called him as i just noticed you called me on it and he said that was with only a stock bottom (afr heads, intake). then i did a google search and came up empty...it seems 300 would have been more accurate. i apologize for the misinfo. i still say sc first as i assume he will not be buying heads the next week so that shouldn't be too much of an inconvenience. 96stang im not scared of much and i will never be scared to be wrong
ORIGINAL: Acer2428
There was someone on here with a 9psi Powerdyne. I laughed my ***** off b/c he was only making 240rwhp. I must have pee'd myself laughing. I made 261rwhp with NON P&P heads, valve job, but that's about all.
It's a lot easier to do HEADS first, than it is to install the S/C just to take it off to put the heads on.
P.S. There was an article in MM&FF saying that NPI heads weren't so bad, in fact P&P NPI heads outflowed STOCK PI heads.
There was someone on here with a 9psi Powerdyne. I laughed my ***** off b/c he was only making 240rwhp. I must have pee'd myself laughing. I made 261rwhp with NON P&P heads, valve job, but that's about all.
It's a lot easier to do HEADS first, than it is to install the S/C just to take it off to put the heads on.
P.S. There was an article in MM&FF saying that NPI heads weren't so bad, in fact P&P NPI heads outflowed STOCK PI heads.
i thought a guy around here made 350+ but i called him as i just noticed you called me on it and he said that was with only a stock bottom (afr heads, intake). then i did a google search and came up empty...it seems 300 would have been more accurate. i apologize for the misinfo. i still say sc first as i assume he will not be buying heads the next week so that shouldn't be too much of an inconvenience. 96stang im not scared of much and i will never be scared to be wrong
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
