4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2006, 07:15 PM
  #51  
redass02gt
EXTREME Moderation
 
redass02gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BLAM-O
Posts: 7,895
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

"It's not even a comparison"

sounds like you're saying the 4v > 3v

edit: if you're saying you'd rather have a mach 1 over an 05 gt, that's different, cause that's an entire car, but the old 4v isn't any better of a motor than a new 3v.
redass02gt is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 07:16 PM
  #52  
XxphantomsnypzxX
3rd Gear Member
 
XxphantomsnypzxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 942
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

he said he would take it, not that it was better [:'(]
XxphantomsnypzxX is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 07:19 PM
  #53  
redass02gt
EXTREME Moderation
 
redass02gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BLAM-O
Posts: 7,895
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

ORIGINAL: XxphantomsnypzxX

he said he would take it, not that it was better [:'(]
wouldn't the only reason for taking it be that it's a better motor?? I thought that was the point.

but the 2v isn't dead, it's just that a lot of 4.6 2v motors are still under warranty and being used for daily driving, not heavily modded project cars. give it a few years.
redass02gt is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 07:24 PM
  #54  
blueangelfightr
5th Gear Member
 
blueangelfightr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 3,645
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?


ORIGINAL: redass02gt

ORIGINAL: XxphantomsnypzxX

he said he would take it, not that it was better [:'(]
wouldn't the only reason for taking it be that it's a better motor?? I thought that was the point.

but the 2v isn't dead, it's just that a lot of 4.6 2v motors are still under warranty and being used for daily driving, not heavily modded project cars. give it a few years.
No. It would have to be a 03/04 cobra engine. You can't even compare the two. Totally forged engine vs. a little 3v. I don't even care if the car comes with it. I just want the engine. Heck, keep the eaton too. My kenne bell would fit just as well on top. I'm sorry, but are you going to be running 600 RWHP from a stock 3v. I Think not.
blueangelfightr is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 07:30 PM
  #55  
redass02gt
EXTREME Moderation
 
redass02gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BLAM-O
Posts: 7,895
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

ORIGINAL: blueangelfightr

No. It would have to be a 03/04 cobra engine. You can't even compare the two. Totally forged engine vs. a little 3v. I don't even care if the car comes with it. I just want the engine. Heck, keep the eaton too. My kenne bell would fit just as well on top. I'm sorry, but are you going to be running 600 RWHP from a stock 3v. I Think not.
this is why the cyl. head airflow is an important point, because in theory, you could get a 3v with forged internals to a higher HP because it can recieve more air (although the forced induction of the cobra makes this less important). it's the same reason the LS1/2 respond so damn well to mods. In other words, you can make an n/a 3v pump more air than a n/a 4v.
redass02gt is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 07:43 PM
  #56  
blueangelfightr
5th Gear Member
 
blueangelfightr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 3,645
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?


ORIGINAL: redass02gt

ORIGINAL: blueangelfightr

No. It would have to be a 03/04 cobra engine. You can't even compare the two. Totally forged engine vs. a little 3v. I don't even care if the car comes with it. I just want the engine. Heck, keep the eaton too. My kenne bell would fit just as well on top. I'm sorry, but are you going to be running 600 RWHP from a stock 3v. I Think not.
this is why the cyl. head airflow is an important point, because in theory, you could get a 3v with forged internals to a higher HP because it can recieve more air (although the forced induction of the cobra makes this less important). it's the same reason the LS1/2 respond so damn well to mods. In other words, you can make an n/a 3v pump more air than a n/a 4v.
I could care less about N/A. I want my kenne bell damn it! lol.
blueangelfightr is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 08:38 PM
  #57  
DILO2001GT
I ♥ Acer
 
DILO2001GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 2,781
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

i was just reading in MM&FF that the 3v is alot harder to make parts for aftermarket companies.

quote
-The camshaft is controlled electronically through sensors and oil relief valves-further complicating development of performance-enhancing aftermarket parts. The computer advances and retards the camshaft timing. One good thing out of all this is that Ford gave us 300 HP from the factory.

i for some reason love the 2v maybe because I'm use to it since its been my only car I have ever owned and I know it pretty well but I think it would be hard to turn down a 4v.
DILO2001GT is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 09:47 PM
  #58  
czwalga00gt
5th Gear Member
 
czwalga00gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Posts: 3,062
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

Guys guys, we're all missing the point here...


LS1, LS2, LS6, LS7 >>> 5.0, 4.6: 2v,3v,4v [sm=closed.gif]



[sm=happybounce.gif]
czwalga00gt is offline  
Old 01-12-2006, 12:14 AM
  #59  
tlthotrod
 
tlthotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 9
Default RE: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?

The 3v heads will fit the block of the 2v, as was stated before, the blocks are the same( with exception to material made with). You'll need more then the heads though. My nieghbor has the 3v heads bolted on his car but the 2v intake is far from fitting and he doesn't want to run the 3v setup, so his project is on hold till he figures out where he is going to go with it. There will be trial and error until it's figured out. I'll keep everyone posted as he goes if any one is interested.
tlthotrod is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jgrimm
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
32
01-22-2015 11:08 AM
Runningoutofcreativenames
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
4
03-03-2013 03:43 PM
Larry'sGarage
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
9
08-05-2012 09:42 PM
manueltijerina
4.6L General Discussion
1
07-27-2008 08:10 AM
ben790450
4.6L General Discussion
8
08-15-2007 01:50 PM



Quick Reply: Is the 4.6L 2v a lost cause?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.