4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

SRT-4??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2006, 08:41 PM
  #11  
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: SRT-4??

mid 13s now? errmm... i dunno about mid. i consider 13.4-13.6 mid, i don't recall seeing any slips, videos or real life ones run that stock.
nanaki is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 08:50 PM
  #12  
MustangMafia
4th Gear Member
 
MustangMafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: SRT-4??

I haven't either. But a friend of mine with quite a bit of strip experience said he saw one run 13.7 with only a CAI.
MustangMafia is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 09:22 PM
  #13  
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: SRT-4??

fair enough. just cause i haven't seen it, doesn't mean it hasn't been done. just like a 99+ running a 13.9.
nanaki is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 09:24 PM
  #14  
MustangMafia
4th Gear Member
 
MustangMafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: SRT-4??

Yea I hard about that too. Suppose it's possible for either cars to run those times, but I would imagine EVERYTHING would have to be perfect. But SRT-4s really dont scare me. Most of the srt-4 owners around here dont cant drive.
MustangMafia is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 11:19 PM
  #15  
SVTCobra_98
2nd Gear Member
 
SVTCobra_98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 301
Default RE: SRT-4??

My friend has one with exhaust and BOV and ran 13.9. They are pretty quick, I still beat him though
SVTCobra_98 is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 12:14 AM
  #16  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default RE: SRT-4??

i raced one at the track that was bone stock and it ran a 14.1 something, not its best run of the night, i ran .017 slower than it in the ET column

the first time i ran earlier in the year, ther was another one in the 13.9's @100.** that i went dwon there with

the second time, whne i raced one, he also hit a 13.9 @100**
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 02:03 AM
  #17  
DrBob
2nd Gear Member
 
DrBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 214
Default RE: SRT-4??

ORIGINAL: Brute03

yea those srt's are pretty quick, i was actually considering picking up an 04.....but can you picture 6' 2" 220lb guy driving a neon? [:'(]
I am 5'11" and weigh 235, and I drive my wife's Jetta[&o]
DrBob is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 03:34 AM
  #18  
1BAD3V
6th Gear Member
 
1BAD3V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,828
Default RE: SRT-4??

I think with your 3.73's you could probably take him because most SRT-4 drivers suck at shifting. Good luck.
1BAD3V is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 04:46 AM
  #19  
boss281
3rd Gear Member
 
boss281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 775
Default RE: SRT-4??


ORIGINAL: nanaki

get some tires so you can launch and hook, you should be able to easily take him if he's stock with those 3.73s.
i raced a 99-04 gt tonight he had 3.73s and the race was neck to neck till we hit 100mph (4th gear in my car) then he started to gain on me. my point is i expected more out of gears, dont see what the fuzz is about......
boss281 is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 06:08 AM
  #20  
MustangMafia
4th Gear Member
 
MustangMafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: SRT-4??

3.73s over 3.27 isnt going to be that big of a difference. I'm not saying that 3.73 isnt a good ratio. But personally, I wouldnt waste money going from 3.27 to 3.73. I'd go with 3.90 or 4.10. But thats just me
MustangMafia is offline  


Quick Reply: SRT-4??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.