4.10 vs 4.30
02-12-2006, 05:33 PM
#12
RE: 4.10 vs 4.30
ORIGINAL: rudemood12
what would be a downside to the 4.30s in an auto as a DD? anything?
what would be a downside to the 4.30s in an auto as a DD? anything?
02-12-2006, 05:37 PM
#13
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,797
RE: 4.10 vs 4.30
ORIGINAL: gt96stang
You have a 2001.. You have a 3650 tranny.
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
So I have decided to go with atleast 4.10 in my Mustang (t45). I have decided to side with the people who HAVE gears and tell me from experience that it doesn't affect mileage that much, than listening to a mass of retarded who bad-mouth lower gears because they have listened to myths and are passing them on. So why dont people opt to go with 4.30 instead of 4.10? On the highway it doesnt seem much of a difference. I used a calculator and I saw that with 4.30 at 70mhp, you will only be 150RPM higher than if you have 4.10s. So what is it about them that turns people away? I have only seen a couple people that had 4.30s. Is first gear too short? Is too hard to launch? Does it make daily driving a pain in the *** or somethin? Anybody know why this isnt a very popular gear?
Also another question. Why do people call 4.10 gears 4.11s all the time? I always wondered this....
So I have decided to go with atleast 4.10 in my Mustang (t45). I have decided to side with the people who HAVE gears and tell me from experience that it doesn't affect mileage that much, than listening to a mass of retarded who bad-mouth lower gears because they have listened to myths and are passing them on. So why dont people opt to go with 4.30 instead of 4.10? On the highway it doesnt seem much of a difference. I used a calculator and I saw that with 4.30 at 70mhp, you will only be 150RPM higher than if you have 4.10s. So what is it about them that turns people away? I have only seen a couple people that had 4.30s. Is first gear too short? Is too hard to launch? Does it make daily driving a pain in the *** or somethin? Anybody know why this isnt a very popular gear?
Also another question. Why do people call 4.10 gears 4.11s all the time? I always wondered this....
Great info. Im guessing that you know more than he does about his own car?????
02-12-2006, 05:53 PM
#14
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 3,689
RE: 4.10 vs 4.30
ORIGINAL: ZW99GT
Great info. Im guessing that you know more than he does about his own car?????
ORIGINAL: gt96stang
You have a 2001.. You have a 3650 tranny.
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
So I have decided to go with atleast 4.10 in my Mustang (t45). I have decided to side with the people who HAVE gears and tell me from experience that it doesn't affect mileage that much, than listening to a mass of retarded who bad-mouth lower gears because they have listened to myths and are passing them on. So why dont people opt to go with 4.30 instead of 4.10? On the highway it doesnt seem much of a difference. I used a calculator and I saw that with 4.30 at 70mhp, you will only be 150RPM higher than if you have 4.10s. So what is it about them that turns people away? I have only seen a couple people that had 4.30s. Is first gear too short? Is too hard to launch? Does it make daily driving a pain in the *** or somethin? Anybody know why this isnt a very popular gear?
Also another question. Why do people call 4.10 gears 4.11s all the time? I always wondered this....
So I have decided to go with atleast 4.10 in my Mustang (t45). I have decided to side with the people who HAVE gears and tell me from experience that it doesn't affect mileage that much, than listening to a mass of retarded who bad-mouth lower gears because they have listened to myths and are passing them on. So why dont people opt to go with 4.30 instead of 4.10? On the highway it doesnt seem much of a difference. I used a calculator and I saw that with 4.30 at 70mhp, you will only be 150RPM higher than if you have 4.10s. So what is it about them that turns people away? I have only seen a couple people that had 4.30s. Is first gear too short? Is too hard to launch? Does it make daily driving a pain in the *** or somethin? Anybody know why this isnt a very popular gear?
Also another question. Why do people call 4.10 gears 4.11s all the time? I always wondered this....
Great info. Im guessing that you know more than he does about his own car?????
02-12-2006, 09:15 PM
#17
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,860
RE: 4.10 vs 4.30
ORIGINAL: ZW99GT
Great info. Im guessing that you know more than he does about his own car?????
ORIGINAL: gt96stang
You have a 2001.. You have a 3650 tranny.
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
So I have decided to go with atleast 4.10 in my Mustang (t45). I have decided to side with the people who HAVE gears and tell me from experience that it doesn't affect mileage that much, than listening to a mass of retarded who bad-mouth lower gears because they have listened to myths and are passing them on. So why dont people opt to go with 4.30 instead of 4.10? On the highway it doesnt seem much of a difference. I used a calculator and I saw that with 4.30 at 70mhp, you will only be 150RPM higher than if you have 4.10s. So what is it about them that turns people away? I have only seen a couple people that had 4.30s. Is first gear too short? Is too hard to launch? Does it make daily driving a pain in the *** or somethin? Anybody know why this isnt a very popular gear?
Also another question. Why do people call 4.10 gears 4.11s all the time? I always wondered this....
So I have decided to go with atleast 4.10 in my Mustang (t45). I have decided to side with the people who HAVE gears and tell me from experience that it doesn't affect mileage that much, than listening to a mass of retarded who bad-mouth lower gears because they have listened to myths and are passing them on. So why dont people opt to go with 4.30 instead of 4.10? On the highway it doesnt seem much of a difference. I used a calculator and I saw that with 4.30 at 70mhp, you will only be 150RPM higher than if you have 4.10s. So what is it about them that turns people away? I have only seen a couple people that had 4.30s. Is first gear too short? Is too hard to launch? Does it make daily driving a pain in the *** or somethin? Anybody know why this isnt a very popular gear?
Also another question. Why do people call 4.10 gears 4.11s all the time? I always wondered this....
Great info. Im guessing that you know more than he does about his own car?????
02-12-2006, 09:25 PM
#19
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Smithfield. RI
Posts: 810
RE: 4.10 vs 4.30
ORIGINAL: gt96stang
Yes, get them now and a tuner or speedcal to fix the speedo.
ORIGINAL: fastsilverstang
how good are 4.10 on an auto?? would it wake my pony up a lot more??
how good are 4.10 on an auto?? would it wake my pony up a lot more??
02-12-2006, 09:51 PM
#20
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,860
RE: 4.10 vs 4.30
ORIGINAL: rbstang
4.10s at 70mph = about 2,300 rpm
4.30s at 70mph = about 2,400 rpm
Not much of a difference. I enjoy my 4.10s but i think i would enjoy 4.30s even more.
4.10s at 70mph = about 2,300 rpm
4.30s at 70mph = about 2,400 rpm
Not much of a difference. I enjoy my 4.10s but i think i would enjoy 4.30s even more.
