4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2006, 03:58 PM
  #21  
96mod289
2nd Gear Member
 
96mod289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 364
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O

if i had the money i would get a forged bottom end with a twin turbo setup. if olny i had the money and the time
96mod289 is offline  
Old 02-18-2006, 05:33 PM
  #22  
Emann0007
5th Gear Member
 
Emann0007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Orlando, Fl.
Posts: 2,538
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O


ORIGINAL: nanaki

if you put a shot of nitrous on an N/A car, it's not really N/A anymore. that's a nice contradiction. N/A motor with nitrous. why not make an N/A monster with a supercharger or turbo? [:-]
That's what I want. Unfortunately my budget only allows for a future N2O purchase. Turbos and S/C offer 24/7 power. N2O is race track power, not yellow stop light or passing on the highway power...
Emann0007 is offline  
Old 02-18-2006, 05:43 PM
  #23  
domesticfan
3rd Gear Member
 
domesticfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 678
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O

if you cant get it done on all motor, whats the point. just imagine monster cams, high compression pistons, built bottom end, and a custom itb setup on a 4.6L 4v. sick
domesticfan is offline  
Old 02-18-2006, 05:53 PM
  #24  
JonBeast
Moderator
 
JonBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,625
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O


ORIGINAL: MustangMafia

I'd have a fully built high compression titanium block with a KB sittin on top, also with 2 T-76 turbos spraying a 300 shot....
That is such a pointless post KB with twin turbos?


Turbo with a small 50-75 shot to help spool faster.
JonBeast is offline  
Old 02-18-2006, 07:08 PM
  #25  
Dark_Horse
3rd Gear Member
 
Dark_Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 850
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O

Twins with N20 spray to help with turbo lag, then spray infront of I/C, to freeze I/C = BIG POWER!!!!
Dark_Horse is offline  
Old 02-18-2006, 08:16 PM
  #26  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02


ORIGINAL: Stang9946

I mainly believe in "just motor". No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. RAW hp. If I race my 300hp V8 and lose (which no one has beaten me with any car yet) to a car worthy (Corvette, Mustang, Camaro, etc) then fine. Fair enough. If I race a little turbo or twin turbo 4cyl and lose well..ok you beat me but just remember that ALL of my HP comes from the motor. No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. If you still insist that you won fairly or mock my car for having a v8 and being beaten by a 4 cyl....then let me add a s/c to my already naturally 300hp making v8....then we'll talk.
What difference does it make?? Run what ya brung.

Nobody is gonna care if your 300 RWHP N/A 4.6 gets waxed by a 400 RWHP blown one. All that matters is one is faster than the other.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 02-18-2006, 08:55 PM
  #27  
Stang9946
4th Gear Member
 
Stang9946's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,648
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6


ORIGINAL: Stang9946

I mainly believe in "just motor". No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. RAW hp. If I race my 300hp V8 and lose (which no one has beaten me with any car yet) to a car worthy (Corvette, Mustang, Camaro, etc) then fine. Fair enough. If I race a little turbo or twin turbo 4cyl and lose well..ok you beat me but just remember that ALL of my HP comes from the motor. No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. If you still insist that you won fairly or mock my car for having a v8 and being beaten by a 4 cyl....then let me add a s/c to my already naturally 300hp making v8....then we'll talk.
What difference does it make?? Run what ya brung.

Nobody is gonna care if your 300 RWHP N/A 4.6 gets waxed by a 400 RWHP blown one. All that matters is one is faster than the other.
It makes a HUGE difference. If you need a s/c, t/c, n20 or any of that **** to beat another car...well then you don't have much of a car. A friend of mine has a 250hp turbocharged AWD 90 or 91 Talon TSI. How much does he have to the wheels? 190-200? Take away the turbocharger...what's he have now? Less than 170hp if not 150 FLYWHEEL. What's that to the wheels? 100? PATHETIC. Or what about another friend of mine that has a turbo 02 WRX. Stock 0-50 is about 5.2-5.4. Take that turbo away and 0-60 goes up to atleast 7.2 seconds. It makes a HUGE difference. You compared a 300RWHP Mustang to a 400RWHP Mustang (4.6 ). Well no **** the 400hp one is going to beat the 300hp one. Anyone could figure that out. Your comment to what I said was 100% out of context and had nothing to do with ANYTHING I said. And again, I don't mean to sound like a d***, because I appreciate anything and everything everyone of you have suggested to me or any knowledge you all have given me, but what YOU said above has nothing to do with anything.
Stang9946 is offline  
Old 02-18-2006, 10:05 PM
  #28  
domesticfan
3rd Gear Member
 
domesticfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 678
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02

your agruements are if they dont have the power adder, but guess what, they do have one. im a fan of n/a, but your agruement is retarded because if a car has a turbo, and you take it off its going to make less hp, sure. but if it never came with a turbo or supercharger, it would have a different tune with different timeing and compression so it would still make some hp. so, if an evo beats you are you gonna say "take off your turbo and we'll race again?" thats retarded.
domesticfan is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 12:20 AM
  #29  
Stang9946
4th Gear Member
 
Stang9946's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,648
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02

ORIGINAL: domesticfan

your agruements are if they dont have the power adder, but guess what, they do have one. im a fan of n/a, but your agruement is retarded because if a car has a turbo, and you take it off its going to make less hp, sure. but if it never came with a turbo or supercharger, it would have a different tune with different timeing and compression so it would still make some hp. so, if an evo beats you are you gonna say "take off your turbo and we'll race again?" thats retarded.
How is that retarded? You are the second person in this thread to make pointless posts. If the car is running fast times and has a turbo or whatever you choose....then the TURBO is giving those times. You don't see any Vettes or Vipers out of the factory with s/c or t/c on them now do you? The new z06 has 505hp runs the quarter in 11s STOCK. NO BLOWER OR TURBO. How is my arguement retarded? It's not in anyway shape or form. You "disagreeing" with me is retarded because you're trying to make me sound "wrong" when infact i'm not wrong at all. I'm actually 100% correct. The fact that you disagree and think i'm wrong doesn't make you right, it just makes you ignorant. I'm done trying to "defende" my "arguement". It's just become silly. If your car needs a "charger" on it to beat my 300 horse V8...then your car is not fast enough to beat me period.
Stang9946 is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 01:26 AM
  #30  
MustangMafia
4th Gear Member
 
MustangMafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O

ORIGINAL: JonBeast


ORIGINAL: MustangMafia

I'd have a fully built high compression titanium block with a KB sittin on top, also with 2 T-76 turbos spraying a 300 shot....
That is such a pointless post KB with twin turbos?


Turbo with a small 50-75 shot to help spool faster.
My post was a little bit on the sarcastic side if you couldnt tell me by saying I'd have a titanium block....
MustangMafia is offline  


Quick Reply: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.