N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O
#22
RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O
ORIGINAL: nanaki
if you put a shot of nitrous on an N/A car, it's not really N/A anymore. that's a nice contradiction. N/A motor with nitrous. why not make an N/A monster with a supercharger or turbo? [:-]
if you put a shot of nitrous on an N/A car, it's not really N/A anymore. that's a nice contradiction. N/A motor with nitrous. why not make an N/A monster with a supercharger or turbo? [:-]
#24
RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
I'd have a fully built high compression titanium block with a KB sittin on top, also with 2 T-76 turbos spraying a 300 shot....
I'd have a fully built high compression titanium block with a KB sittin on top, also with 2 T-76 turbos spraying a 300 shot....
Turbo with a small 50-75 shot to help spool faster.
#26
RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02
ORIGINAL: Stang9946
I mainly believe in "just motor". No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. RAW hp. If I race my 300hp V8 and lose (which no one has beaten me with any car yet) to a car worthy (Corvette, Mustang, Camaro, etc) then fine. Fair enough. If I race a little turbo or twin turbo 4cyl and lose well..ok you beat me but just remember that ALL of my HP comes from the motor. No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. If you still insist that you won fairly or mock my car for having a v8 and being beaten by a 4 cyl....then let me add a s/c to my already naturally 300hp making v8....then we'll talk.
I mainly believe in "just motor". No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. RAW hp. If I race my 300hp V8 and lose (which no one has beaten me with any car yet) to a car worthy (Corvette, Mustang, Camaro, etc) then fine. Fair enough. If I race a little turbo or twin turbo 4cyl and lose well..ok you beat me but just remember that ALL of my HP comes from the motor. No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. If you still insist that you won fairly or mock my car for having a v8 and being beaten by a 4 cyl....then let me add a s/c to my already naturally 300hp making v8....then we'll talk.
Nobody is gonna care if your 300 RWHP N/A 4.6 gets waxed by a 400 RWHP blown one. All that matters is one is faster than the other.
#27
RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
What difference does it make?? Run what ya brung.
Nobody is gonna care if your 300 RWHP N/A 4.6 gets waxed by a 400 RWHP blown one. All that matters is one is faster than the other.
ORIGINAL: Stang9946
I mainly believe in "just motor". No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. RAW hp. If I race my 300hp V8 and lose (which no one has beaten me with any car yet) to a car worthy (Corvette, Mustang, Camaro, etc) then fine. Fair enough. If I race a little turbo or twin turbo 4cyl and lose well..ok you beat me but just remember that ALL of my HP comes from the motor. No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. If you still insist that you won fairly or mock my car for having a v8 and being beaten by a 4 cyl....then let me add a s/c to my already naturally 300hp making v8....then we'll talk.
I mainly believe in "just motor". No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. RAW hp. If I race my 300hp V8 and lose (which no one has beaten me with any car yet) to a car worthy (Corvette, Mustang, Camaro, etc) then fine. Fair enough. If I race a little turbo or twin turbo 4cyl and lose well..ok you beat me but just remember that ALL of my HP comes from the motor. No s/c, t/c, n2o, etc. If you still insist that you won fairly or mock my car for having a v8 and being beaten by a 4 cyl....then let me add a s/c to my already naturally 300hp making v8....then we'll talk.
Nobody is gonna care if your 300 RWHP N/A 4.6 gets waxed by a 400 RWHP blown one. All that matters is one is faster than the other.
#28
RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02
your agruements are if they dont have the power adder, but guess what, they do have one. im a fan of n/a, but your agruement is retarded because if a car has a turbo, and you take it off its going to make less hp, sure. but if it never came with a turbo or supercharger, it would have a different tune with different timeing and compression so it would still make some hp. so, if an evo beats you are you gonna say "take off your turbo and we'll race again?" thats retarded.
#29
RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N02
ORIGINAL: domesticfan
your agruements are if they dont have the power adder, but guess what, they do have one. im a fan of n/a, but your agruement is retarded because if a car has a turbo, and you take it off its going to make less hp, sure. but if it never came with a turbo or supercharger, it would have a different tune with different timeing and compression so it would still make some hp. so, if an evo beats you are you gonna say "take off your turbo and we'll race again?" thats retarded.
your agruements are if they dont have the power adder, but guess what, they do have one. im a fan of n/a, but your agruement is retarded because if a car has a turbo, and you take it off its going to make less hp, sure. but if it never came with a turbo or supercharger, it would have a different tune with different timeing and compression so it would still make some hp. so, if an evo beats you are you gonna say "take off your turbo and we'll race again?" thats retarded.
#30
RE: N/A, Supercharger, TurboCharger, or N2O
ORIGINAL: JonBeast
That is such a pointless post KB with twin turbos?
Turbo with a small 50-75 shot to help spool faster.
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
I'd have a fully built high compression titanium block with a KB sittin on top, also with 2 T-76 turbos spraying a 300 shot....
I'd have a fully built high compression titanium block with a KB sittin on top, also with 2 T-76 turbos spraying a 300 shot....
Turbo with a small 50-75 shot to help spool faster.