4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Difference in 1999-2004 GT engine and 2005-2009 GT engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2009, 03:08 PM
  #1  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
Thread Starter
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Question Difference in 1999-2004 GT engine and 2005-2009 GT engine

I was thinking of buying a newer (2005-2009) GT. I was wondering what the difference, if any, were there in the two engines? Is the engine they put in the 1999-2004 GTs the same as the 2005-2009 GTs? Thanks guys.
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:10 PM
  #2  
rainydayracing
4th Gear Member
 
rainydayracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pa
Posts: 1,267
Default

I think it's the 3v heads and intake. Correct me if I'm wrong guys, but it's the same block.
rainydayracing is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:14 PM
  #3  
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
boduke0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yadkin, Nc
Posts: 5,183
Default

the 3v's in the 05+ GT's also have VVT (variable valve timing) and a throttle by wire system. and they also dont have plenums, just the throttle body. thats just the motor-ish stuff
boduke0220 is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:15 PM
  #4  
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 4,412
Default

The 05+ uses a 3v SOHC head design combined with VVT (variable valve timing).
amoosenamedhank is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:17 PM
  #5  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
Thread Starter
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Default

Is the 3v and VVT worth the upgrade? A friend I was talking to said the newer engines were built better but after reading what you guys said they are very similar, right?
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:17 PM
  #6  
HaneyMotorsport.Com
Banned
 
HaneyMotorsport.Com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,631
Default

Basically the same. the 3V's have an aluminum block. Basically the same internals, but are 9.8 compression.

Casey
HaneyMotorsport.Com is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:20 PM
  #7  
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 4,412
Default

I wouldn't upgrade the car for the engine alone. But there are plenty other reasons, if you like the body style better, it has a nicer interior, and obviously a newer car.
amoosenamedhank is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:22 PM
  #8  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
Thread Starter
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Default

Originally Posted by amoosenamedhank
I wouldn't upgrade the car for the engine alone. But there are plenty other reasons, if you like the body style better, it has a nicer interior, and obviously a newer car.
That's what I wanted to hear. Does everyone else agree?
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:33 PM
  #9  
E40
 
E40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 18
Default

Yes!!!!
E40 is offline  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:36 PM
  #10  
rainydayracing
4th Gear Member
 
rainydayracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pa
Posts: 1,267
Default

Originally Posted by WannaBeGearHead
That's what I wanted to hear. Does everyone else agree?
If it's worth anything, car & driver recently did a shootout between the new camero, mustang and challenger - the stang won. The general concensus was that ford basically had more time to dial in the car (and yes, that's with the solid rear). The glass coupe roof is pretty cool looking too.
rainydayracing is offline  


Quick Reply: Difference in 1999-2004 GT engine and 2005-2009 GT engine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.