Was searching on Google and found this old thread..
08-27-2009, 04:48 PM
#31
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 1,030
times in order...right, right and left
guess you could say a filter, Hpipe and flows mods. Motor was never touched was SD car, still had the stock intake tubing from filter box.
filter, Hpipe and flows might give you 10hp on a 155k mile motor so mods and age of motor sorta cancel eachother out
guess you could say a filter, Hpipe and flows mods. Motor was never touched was SD car, still had the stock intake tubing from filter box.
filter, Hpipe and flows might give you 10hp on a 155k mile motor so mods and age of motor sorta cancel eachother out
08-27-2009, 04:53 PM
#32
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
youre right it could get into an uneducated arguement. this site is full of arguments. Alot of it comes from inexperience or lack of knowledge or just none belief.
08-27-2009, 04:54 PM
#33
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: california
Posts: 380
STOCK1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.0- 0-60mph= 6.4 - 1/4mile= 14.9
STOCK1999 Ford Mustang GT- o-60= 5.5 1/4mile= 14.1
those are the facts i found. ive also heard on here somebody with a stock new edge running mid 13's.. wednesday cars man
STOCK1999 Ford Mustang GT- o-60= 5.5 1/4mile= 14.1
those are the facts i found. ive also heard on here somebody with a stock new edge running mid 13's.. wednesday cars man
08-27-2009, 04:55 PM
#34
aka 'Negative Nancy'
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,839
dime ran 13.7 bone stock
08-27-2009, 04:58 PM
#35
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: california
Posts: 380
could not remember the name for the life of me.. i think dimebag will beat a BONESTOCK notch.. (mind you that my first stang was a notch and thats my fav mustang)
08-27-2009, 05:08 PM
#36
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
nice!!!!! you can quote Magizine articles. ALso one thing about your fact buddy. 87 and 88s are SD car which run faster from factory then a MAF car of the same build. [notch, hatch,GT,vert]
08-27-2009, 05:14 PM
#37
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 1,030
1987 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 14.4 (Automobile, April 87)
1988 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 15.0 (MT Jan '88)
08-27-2009, 05:17 PM
#39
aka 'Negative Nancy'
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,839
where did i say that? please go **** yourself, dont take anything i say and try and drag me into this, someone mentioned someone here running mid 13s and couldnt remember who it was, so i said it was dime.
08-27-2009, 05:21 PM
#40
aka 'Negative Nancy'
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,839
in fact, i personally think youre all ****ing idiots for debating this...no car is consistant at every track.... track prep and DA are huge factors...two equal cars can run a second part at different tracks, but it doesnt make one slower than the other... hell you can lose a second by switching to a different track in another part of the country...line a PI 4.6 up with a bone stock 5.0 fox at the same track, same day, right next to each other, and the PI gt will win, hands down....but saying that "stock gts run 14.0, and foxes run 14.4" is stupid....atleast find real world slips and correct them for DA and then compare that, even though thats weak too
Last edited by 99BlackPonyGT; 08-27-2009 at 05:24 PM.