Just landed $150.. here's my choices..
#11
baseline makes a nasty lca too, i vote for that
http://www.baselinesuspensions.com/kits/ford.htm
its 175, but that's close enough
http://www.baselinesuspensions.com/kits/ford.htm
its 175, but that's close enough
#13
You can't run a panhard OR torque arm. The use of a torque arm requires the use of a panhard or watt's link in order to located the axle.
#14
^ actually.... there is a cheat in which I would NEVER do myself, nor recommend, but is an option for those that DON'T want to go PHB with TA. One can leave the stock passenger side UCA and remove the driver's side. This will reduce some of the bind created by the UCA's as well as continue the side to side location of the axle.
Again.... I would not do this, but can be done as a cost cutter.
Jazzer
Again.... I would not do this, but can be done as a cost cutter.
Jazzer
#16
Ooops... never answered the question
My vote is poly/spherical LCA's, such as UPR. If you plan on running that blower, you will likely end up running some sticky's out back and might consider going Griggs MCA 4500 S-99
Jazzer
My vote is poly/spherical LCA's, such as UPR. If you plan on running that blower, you will likely end up running some sticky's out back and might consider going Griggs MCA 4500 S-99
Jazzer
#17
^ actually.... there is a cheat in which I would NEVER do myself, nor recommend, but is an option for those that DON'T want to go PHB with TA. One can leave the stock passenger side UCA and remove the driver's side. This will reduce some of the bind created by the UCA's as well as continue the side to side location of the axle.
Again.... I would not do this, but can be done as a cost cutter.
Jazzer
Again.... I would not do this, but can be done as a cost cutter.
Jazzer
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post