4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

dyno #s low

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2009, 03:21 PM
  #1  
fisher2985
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
fisher2985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 206
Thumbs down dyno #s low

i know im an auto but i think i should put down more than 236 with full bolt ons. it was dyno day at big wood racing, and an 04 auto without long tubes, gears, or underdrive pulleys put down 242. i know my front 02's are bad (got em on my toolbox at work, awaiting extension harness) but i thought at wot they didnt matter. anyone got any suggestions.
fisher2985 is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 03:31 PM
  #2  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Default

Ya those number do seem low. Is that the corrected numbers?
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 03:32 PM
  #3  
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,955
Default

what was the temp like when u got dynoed?

that doesn't seem too far off.

Gears do nothing on the dyno.

With that said i wouldn't worry too much about dyno numbers, go run your car and let us see those numbers.
SVTeeshirt is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 03:41 PM
  #4  
fisher2985
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
fisher2985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 206
Default

8.70 wit a 1.99 60ft. but im thinking i shud have another 20 horses and maybe get close to 8.50.
fisher2985 is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 03:50 PM
  #5  
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,955
Default

Originally Posted by fisher2985
8.70 wit a 1.99 60ft. but im thinking i shud have another 20 horses and maybe get close to 8.50.
not bad, those are the numbers to worry about, whocares if that other car put down more than you, if you can beat him on the track who cares what a dyno says.
SVTeeshirt is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 03:58 PM
  #6  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by fisher2985
i know im an auto but i think i should put down more than 236 with full bolt ons. it was dyno day at big wood racing, and an 04 auto without long tubes, gears, or underdrive pulleys put down 242. i know my front 02's are bad (got em on my toolbox at work, awaiting extension harness) but i thought at wot they didnt matter. anyone got any suggestions.
What octane fuel are you running, what is your AFR at WOT? If you don't have a wide band O2 sensor, you need one to do any serious tuning--the OEM tune tends to be rich at WOT because there are no knock sensors and Ford wanted to make sure the engines didn't blow up.

Also, the canned tunes from any tuner are quite conservative with timing advance, and I've never seen one that addressed the tendancy toward rich at WOT mentioned above--with good reason, the fellows that sell tuners son't want your engine to blow up either.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 04:17 PM
  #7  
fisher2985
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
fisher2985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 206
Default

i've got a granitelli tune, but it was way rich like more than a 12.0. i also advanced the timing and extra 4 degrees over the 93 octane tune that was preset.
fisher2985 is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 04:18 PM
  #8  
fisher2985
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
fisher2985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by SVTeeshirt
not bad, those are the numbers to worry about, whocares if that other car put down more than you, if you can beat him on the track who cares what a dyno says.
im just thinking that with the new o2's working properly i shud be at 255 with maybe a better et.
it was my 1st time at the track too, but now im deff hooked.

Last edited by fisher2985; 09-19-2009 at 04:20 PM.
fisher2985 is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 04:25 PM
  #9  
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
MU71L4710N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
Default

correct me if im wrong but your 02 sensors have no input on the motor. all it will do is pop a CEL letting you know your emissions system isnt working.

full boltons with lt's is usually around 260rwhp. HOWEVER, the horsepower numbers dont mean crap because they can be altered with by the tuner. they could have just not corrected for certain elevations and stuff like that. your AF ratio bieng off is what your concern should be, could be your car is running so rich your losing power. have you gotten your car dyno tuned? or just using a canned tune off the internet? if you havent gotten a dyno tune thats probably your problem, not your 02 sensors.
MU71L4710N is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 04:30 PM
  #10  
fisher2985
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
fisher2985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 206
Default

canned tune but its the upstream sensors that are bad. keeps setting a code, surges bad, and runs rough at idle. had same problem couple of weeks ago, and moved rear o2's to front since they are cut off anyway. ran better for a little while but now im gonna properly fix it.
and yes the upstream o2's control air fuel ratio, just not sure if it makes a big difference at wot. im a drivability tech but new to high performance.
fisher2985 is offline  


Quick Reply: dyno #s low



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM.