4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

rebuild on 2v - stay na or sc pros and cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2009, 08:03 PM
  #11  
Hangwire
4th Gear Member
 
Hangwire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 1,956
Default

Originally Posted by H0SS302
Im an n/a man myself; I just like the way the power comes on. I dont think driving around at 400hp for a DD is very practical so spending 4 grand on good heads/cams/ intake would be worth it to me.

Just my .02
KBs are pretty darn street friendly and practical. You are at full control on whether you go into boost or not. You can cruise around as if it were 100% NA all day long if you wish.

OP
400RWHP with NA=$8,000 at a minimum.
Cons - Obnoxious street drivability. Absolutely no room to grow, your engine is already tapped for all its power. You have to rev your engine to the moon to see that power. Costs twice as much.
Pros - A really nice cammed up exhaust note(achievable with an S/C). You can say "I'm cool because my engine doesn't use compressed air"

400RWHP with FI=$3000 at a minimum.
Cons - None
Pros - Room go grow another 50-100RWHP depending on what SC you get, some have even more than 100RWHP over 400 to be gotten(with forged internals). Full boost at anywhere from 1/4th the RPMS to 1/2 the RPMs that a N/A engine needs to see to match that power. Way more street friendly. Costs half of an N/A build. Supercharger sounds badass, especially so with a Kenne Bell.

Choice is yours.

Last edited by Hangwire; 10-13-2009 at 08:05 PM.
Hangwire is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 08:16 PM
  #12  
Tim99GT
4th Gear Member
 
Tim99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,700
Default

Originally Posted by Fobra
Doing an N/A modular will leave you full of disappointment... with an empty wallet
+ 1 Billion!!!

Originally Posted by smashten
I love the sound of some cams compared to the whistle of some SC's and 400 HP at the flywheel should fill the need
No it wont... Well it may.. for about 2 months..
Then you'll want more. Trust me.. you will.
Tim99GT is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 08:21 PM
  #13  
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
MU71L4710N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
Default

if this is a DD stay away from NA. when you get into heads and cams and all that stuff, your daily driving goes down the toilet. you have zero power down low and end up burning alot of gas just to get moving. you will spend thousands of dollars and probably wont even hit 400 engine hp.

you can sc your car for half of what your thinking. a used centri blower kit can be had for 2 grand or less. it will have little affect on your daily driving (some hp is robbed by the extra pulley on your accessory belt but not much). if you want a KB plan on 5-6 grand but it will be alot more fun to drive with a KB over a centri blower.


and around 450 engine horsepower (not wheel hp) is the breaking point on the rods, no where near 600. rods are the weakest point on our motors. our cranks arent bad but the rods are like pencils.

Last edited by MU71L4710N; 10-13-2009 at 08:23 PM.
MU71L4710N is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 08:28 PM
  #14  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default

Id get forged internals and get the s/c. Way more driver friendly and way more options to choose from.

Trust me you'll be happy with the s/c...if you're not you're a corpse lol.
mustangmancp is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 09:19 PM
  #15  
EagleStroker
5th Gear Member
 
EagleStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,377
Default

Why not build a short block with a decent compression, say 9.3, with mild cams and good heads. Then when it's not enough you don't have to tear it back down to keep going.
EagleStroker is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 09:22 PM
  #16  
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
boduke0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yadkin, Nc
Posts: 5,183
Default

i have a feeling this is gonna turn into a na vs sc thread.


But IMO Trevors and 01GT's cars are much cooler than and no offense, the sc'ed guys car. i just like how they are the "underdogs" and with like 300rwhp they run low 12's. but yea im not denying that your gonna dump alot of money into the na route vs sc. but what it boils down too in almost every thread in this forum is WHAT YOU WANT OUT OF YOUR CAR. most of us just tell you the best way to get the most hp per $$..and thats a supercharger or Nitrous.

/rant hahaha
boduke0220 is offline  
Old 10-13-2009, 09:39 PM
  #17  
EagleStroker
5th Gear Member
 
EagleStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,377
Default

Haha definitely. There is always nitrous if he did a crazy N/A build and wanted more. The 2v is a pig unfortunately and it's just hard to make motor power. I think a 4v head swap would be more cost effective but that's a whole nother game!

Get the trick flow heads, some nice but not to aggressive cams, and a 10 : 1 or so compression and run her to 8000 and enjoy it.

To those that say N/A isn't streetable I DD mine.
EagleStroker is offline  
Old 10-14-2009, 07:51 PM
  #18  
smashten
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
smashten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 130
Default

Talk about peer pressure! Somehow I was trying to convince myself I could get enough power NA and supercharger would just leave me spinning anyway. What was I thinking?

Another day gone by and KB is in the lead. Really want that low end torque. Like they say no replacement for displacement......even if its artificial.

I'm thinking the 600 hp breaking point I heard about was the crank. I guess I'll shell out extra for quality rods and pistons.

Bonus is I can move fwd with my rebuild before I have to save for all the NA goodies!
smashten is offline  
Old 10-14-2009, 08:25 PM
  #19  
Mustang_NTriangle
5th Gear Member
 
Mustang_NTriangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 2,402
Default

Originally Posted by boduke0220
well our rods are actually the weakest part. they go at 450. i tihnk our pistons start to go around 500.

I personally am staying naturally aspirated. i just like the thought of a high reving motor going down the strip and maybe suprising a few people. Im gonna rework my bottom end and get some TF head friendly cams and see if she wont make 380rwhp+. and still be a DD.
Well I cracked my piston at 410 rwhp at 10 psi. OP stock motor will be fine to a point and recommend going with supercharger vs. na. You would be perfectly fine at 8 psi keep wrhp under 400 rwhp like 370 or so.

You will hear from people on the board that they are running 10 psi or 12 psi on stock bottom end but don't recommend it. In terms of what the correct power level is depends on the tune but also how you drive your car. So, 370-380 rwhp with a good tune you can drive the **** off of your car.
Mustang_NTriangle is offline  
Old 10-14-2009, 09:25 PM
  #20  
1999 GT
3rd Gear Member
 
1999 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 897
Default

kb... / of thread
1999 GT is offline  


Quick Reply: rebuild on 2v - stay na or sc pros and cons



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.