4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

stage 2 cams vs drivability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2009, 09:15 PM
  #21  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

^^^Their are cams made exactly for that.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:37 PM
  #22  
tws1098
4th Gear Member
 
tws1098's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 1,624
Default

Originally Posted by mrtstang
^^^Their are cams made exactly for that.
aren't stage 1s generally better for that application? Or are we talking specific profiles?
tws1098 is offline  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:46 PM
  #23  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Yes, but they don't have to always be stage 1's. Cams that have advanced intake centerlines, with very specific exhaust duty will greatly benefit the PI mod motors.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:56 PM
  #24  
tws1098
4th Gear Member
 
tws1098's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 1,624
Default

Originally Posted by mrtstang
Yes, but they don't have to always be stage 1's. Cams that have advanced intake centerlines, with very specific exhaust duty will greatly benefit the PI mod motors.
gotcha.
tws1098 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
12-27-2021 08:09 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
10-05-2015 02:24 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
09-30-2015 10:13 AM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
09-25-2015 09:06 AM



Quick Reply: stage 2 cams vs drivability



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.