4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

The myth about Turbos..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:26 AM
  #1  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default The myth about Turbos..

Lately I have been receiving PM's about turbos and I have decided to make a thread addressing some of these questions.

Turbos are not great because the have turbo lag.
Lets start with the infamous turbo lag: Take a stock 2v and add a single turbo kit with a T70 Master power turbo with a A/R of .96 and you will see FULL BOOST at 3500 rpms. The "turbo lag" is from idle to 3500. However, this is a good turbo to work with, if one is looking to go above 550 RWHP. The T70 can produce 700 RWHP. If one desires to stay below 450 RWHP, a single T61 or T57 would be a better choice. The spool will be quicker and will utilize more of the power band.
A properly sized turbo for a stock application will virtually have zero lag. Take a T61 with an A/R of .58 and you will have full boost before 2500 rpms. If you down shift, your going to be above 2500 rpms, you will be in full boost and there will be instant power. In road racing no one is really ever below that.

BTW look up Y2k02 or something like that. He has a twin turbo mustang making crazy power. Show me a supercharger making the same power as him on the same boost...

Are ball bearing turbos worth it?
Ball bearing turbos are not worth it IMO. They cost significantly more to only spool 200-300 rpms faster than non ball bearing turbos.

Single or twins?
Eye of the beholder. IMO single. Twins you are paying for the extra turbo, waste gate, extra piping, etc... They both will perform the same when properly sized.

Is getting a right sized turbo for a car is very difficult?
No. This is a long read so bear with me. For starters we must figure out the CFM that our engine will flow. For that we must use the formula (CID X RPMS) / 3456 = CFM
(281 X 5500) / 3456 = 447.2 CFM at 100% VE. Since this doesn't exist we must live with what we have which in reality is 85%. Take 447.2 CFM X .85 = 380.12.

Next we must look at the pressure ratio. This formula is (# of boost + 14.7 which is atsmosperic pressure AKA 1 bar) / 14.7 = PR

In your case you might look at 8 psi.
(8 PSI + 14.7) / 14.7 = 1.544

Lets also say the density ratio is 1.33. Just take my word on this... its a long formula and I don't want to write it all out and explain it.

Now we want to find the airflow in Lbs/min. We now use this formula...
Outlet CFM X Density Ratio = Actual Inlet CFM
380.2 X 1.33 = 505.666 CFM
Take that and multiply it by .069 to get the conversion for CFM to Lbs./min
505.666 X .069 = 34.89 Lbs/min

This is a compressor map of a much better turbo but you can use it as reference. http://www.turbomustangs.com/turbotech/compmaps/t61.jpg

The X axis will be the 34.89 Lbs/min while the Y axis will be the 1.544 AKA Pressure ratio.

Looking at that map, the coordinates falls right in the "ring or Island" of efficiency. Each ring represents efficiency with the best being 78%. Notice the coordinates falls right in the 78% range. You want to be in the 70% or above.

Hope this helps!

For those that want to get more acquainted with turbos I highly suggest your read this:
http://www.turbomustangs.com/turbotech/main.htm
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:31 AM
  #2  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Im not going to compare turbos vs superchargers.. The argument is old, out played, and people will always have differences of opinions. Everyone may know my stance and ill leave it there.
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:50 AM
  #3  
Bman2000
4th Gear Member
 
Bman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,501
Default

and turbos are better. lol
Bman2000 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:52 AM
  #4  
Aereon
5th Gear Member
 
Aereon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SF Bay.
Posts: 3,035
Default

We all know twin turbo's aren't necessary in most applications, but from a turbo fan boy's perspective twin turbo's are just so fuggin sexy.

I've poked around turbomustangs, just depressing most of the time reading about how almost everyone can get this except for us in nazifornia=/
Aereon is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:53 AM
  #5  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Solid information--well done!
cliffyk is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:54 AM
  #6  
Mr Graystang
4th Gear Member
 
Mr Graystang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,944
Default

the only edge that S/C's have on turbo's is cost. Great info ! Sticky ???
Mr Graystang is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 12:57 AM
  #7  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Originally Posted by Bman2000
and turbos are better. lol
Hehe. I dont disagree

Originally Posted by Aereon
We all know twin turbo's aren't necessary in most applications, but from a turbo fan boy's perspective twin turbo's are just so fuggin sexy.

I've poked around turbomustangs, just depressing most of the time reading about how almost everyone can get this except for us in nazifornia=/
They are incredible attractive. But to me any turbo system is attractive. Either single or twin.

Originally Posted by cliffyk
Solid information--well done!
Thank you sir. Took my time writing this out. Hope this helps others with their turbo needs.
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 01:00 AM
  #8  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Graystang
the only edge that Centri's have on turbo's is cost. Great info ! Sticky ???
Fixed!
Kenne bell costs $6000 or so. My entire single turbo kit will cost me $4k and this is entirely custom. Pony down performance is the turbo kit I would go with and they cost $2500.

K member is a must change period if your staying N/A, Turbos, or Supercharger. It really does change the feel and I recommend it to everyone. My car feels more agile.
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 01:36 AM
  #9  
H0SS302
6th Gear Member
 
H0SS302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
Default

Good info, I was always under the impression that twin turbos were effective when you want a rocket ship. you have 1 big snail and a smaller one to compensate for the lag on the big turbo.
H0SS302 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 02:26 AM
  #10  
Dteal23
3rd Gear Member
 
Dteal23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 681
Default

good good info
Dteal23 is offline  


Quick Reply: The myth about Turbos..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.