4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Power curve: Centri vs. Roots?

Old 04-12-2010, 08:34 AM
  #31  
Eagle2000GT
4th Gear Member
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,088
Default

If you are cruising and not accelerating the motor is operating in vacuum. It doesn’t matter how much boost the supercharger is generating. I once cruised at 5000 rpms in third gear for a brief moment. (Can’t do it too long because it will pump the oil pan dry.) The vacuum gage showed vacuum not boost. Open the throttle to accelerate and the gage immediately went to boost. Boost was being generated but it wasn’t being used.

Originally Posted by 2000AZ5.0GT
What happens is yes, the BPV is open, but it can only recirculate so much air, some still has to go into the engine. Pressurized air is essentially going to take the path of least resistance, which isn't the BPV. The BPV is a one way valve, there cannot be low pressure and high pressure in the BPV at the same time, so as was posted, it's either open or it's not.
This is an incorrect statement. The by-pass valve is held open by vacuum. A spring closes it when vacuum decreases. The butterfly valve in the by-pass valve opens and closes exactly opposite of the butterfly valve in the throttle body. I have worked the throttle manually under the hood and watched the by-pass valve partially close and then reopen. It is true that the pressure will take the path of least resistance. That path is not through a mostly closed butterfly valve in the throttle body but out the mostly open by-pass valve. When the throttle is open the opposite is true. Then the by-pass valve is closed and the path of least resistance is through the throttle body.

Originally Posted by teej281
I think we honestly have to look at each individual setup here because i hear things like "Recirculate" and think hmm...maybe some people see boost at part throttle because they recirculate their boost from the bpv/bov instead of venting it to the atmosphere like some on here do. So AZ and the rest of you guys, are you recirculating or venting the BPV/BOV???
I’ve run my system both ways and it makes no difference. It is called a by-pass valve if you “recirculate” the air. It’s called a blow-off valve if you vent to atmosphere. It’s the same valve either way. (Note: I run a blow through MAF which allows me to vent to atmosphere.)

Originally Posted by 99 GT vert
i am not positive but i think my cousins car makes boost in partial throttle with his procharger.
You are absolutely correct. A centrifugal supercharger generates boost in proportion to rpm. Mine generates 1.8 psi at 2500 rpms and 8.9 psi at 6000. It always does this regardless of speed or throttle position. But this doesn’t get past the throttle body to the manifold unless you are accelerating. Whether this is at 60% open throttle or 80% open throttle probably depends on how much boost you are generating. It will be different for a supercharger generating 20 psi from one generating 9 psi.

Originally Posted by MustangMan00
I can see boost when not in WOT. It will be about 1-3 psi but you can still get boost while not in WOT
You are running a Vortech at around 380 rwhp so you probably have 9-10 psi at 6000 rpms and probably have a similar boost curve to mine. If I go wide open throttle at 2500 rpms my boost gage will immediately read 1.8 psi and then start increasing with rpm. Partial throttle might see 1 psi or less. A slow acceleration will stay in vacuum and never see boost. At 5000 rpms I can see a larger amount of boost at partial throttle than I see at 2500 rpm.

But you can accelerate without ever letting boost into the motor. A closed throttle causes about 17 inched of Mercury (vacuum). If you are driving for fuel economy you then slowly accelerate shifting when the vacuum/boost gage reads 10 inches of Mercury (vacuum). I have done this and slowly accelerated to 70 mph never reading boost on the vacuum/boost gage.

Last edited by Eagle2000GT; 04-12-2010 at 08:41 AM.
Eagle2000GT is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 08:56 AM
  #32  
jmn444
1st Gear Member
 
jmn444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 72
Default

so here is my question of the day...

running average 295's, nothing super sticky, with a turbo (i'm assuming similar characteristics to a centri) pushing around 7-8psi which should break the 400rwhp mark in my '07 4.6L, if I were to floor it in 1st without dumping the clutch, would i be spinning thru 1st gear? or would the power build in a way that should keep it planted fairly well?

2nd question, assuming that it would stay hooked fairly well, is it also safe to assume that dumping the clutch at 3500+ would smoke them easily?

I've never driven a turbo/centri car, but leaning towards trying a turbo in my SGT... still researching the options though. I prefer to hook and go over the instant smoke show of a roots, but also want to know smoking them is still "easy" to do intentionally with the turbo/centri setups...
jmn444 is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 10:16 AM
  #33  
Eagle2000GT
4th Gear Member
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,088
Default

Smoking the tires is not a problem. I'm running 315/35-17s Sumitomo HRZs @ 25 psi tire pressure. I cannot go WOT in first from a dead stop, slow roll, or at 25 mph without breaking the tires loose and hitting the rev limiter. If I launch at 1800 rpms and go half throttle the tires spin and then latter grip but I cannot go WOT and have the tires grip. I cannot shift to second early without spinning and bouncing off the rev limiter (i.e., shifting at 4500 instead of 5800). For some reason if I run it out to 5800 the tires grip better. I cannot under any circumstances just go WOT in second in a corner. The tires break loose and the car goes sideways.

I could put drag radials on it but I drive 20,000 miles per year but I don't want to buy new tires every six months so my solution is throttle control.

Last edited by Eagle2000GT; 04-12-2010 at 10:19 AM.
Eagle2000GT is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 10:22 AM
  #34  
jmn444
1st Gear Member
 
jmn444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 72
Default

That's good to know! I will likely stick with my turbo plans then, as I will always be on street tires anyway.
jmn444 is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 10:46 AM
  #35  
ShadowDrake
5th Gear Member
 
ShadowDrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Whitehall, Michigan
Posts: 2,638
Default

I'll add my dyno sheet here from earlier - A/F was a little rich, it looked like a diesel :P but better safe than sorry.



I have 245/45-17 tires and first gear is out of the question. Second gear holds just fine when ambient temps are ~50 or higher... as long as I'm going in a straight line.

Grip is more about suspension setup than tires! You can have the best tires in the world but a terrible suspension setup and still not hook up. My car isn't set up for traction, it's set up to look nice. It's lowered too far with springs that are too stiff to give me adequate weight transfer - thus my lack of traction.

Edit: Switched links for picture.

Last edited by ShadowDrake; 04-12-2010 at 10:48 AM.
ShadowDrake is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 11:02 AM
  #36  
Furinox
4th Gear Member
 
Furinox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,667
Default

I recently switched from a vortech t-trim to a ported eaton and I like the eaton much better for my driving style. My car is a daily driver and I like to be able to instantly make full boost rather than having full boost right before I let off the gas. The car is much more fun to drive now and actually seems quicker while normal driving around town, while the vortech seemed slightly slower than stock when not flooring it if that's possible. Again, just my perception after having both.
Furinox is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 12:01 PM
  #37  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Originally Posted by 99 GT vert
kb > whipple a buddy of mine has a 3.4 whipple at 19 psi makes 590 rwhp on a dyno jet, i have the 2.8 kenne bell at 20 psi making 588 rwhp on a mustang dyno.
Im talking about the whipple 2.3, not the 3.4. The 2.3 is a pretty BA little blower id say. My buddy on 17psi is making 560rwhp with stock exhaust manifolds, and that was on one of those 85* days we've been having here in south central PA lately on i'd like to say the 3rd run. So his blower and engine were already hot from previous runs and they made some adjustments to his tune and he came out with 560rwhp, but it definitely feels like 580rwhp i'd say. So yea, the 3.4 has its place in certain setups but you need to be cranking that thing to like 23psi or higher for it to be worth it to switch to it over the 2.3. And for a blower thats half a liter smaller putting out close to the same power with less boost, i'd say the whipple is better than the KB, but thats just by my reasoning. All in all, its better than an eaton. lol

To Furinox: Why the switch? And whats the current setup right now

Last edited by teej281; 04-12-2010 at 12:05 PM.
teej281 is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 03:43 PM
  #38  
Furinox
4th Gear Member
 
Furinox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,667
Default

Originally Posted by teej281
Im talking about the whipple 2.3, not the 3.4. The 2.3 is a pretty BA little blower id say. My buddy on 17psi is making 560rwhp with stock exhaust manifolds, and that was on one of those 85* days we've been having here in south central PA lately on i'd like to say the 3rd run. So his blower and engine were already hot from previous runs and they made some adjustments to his tune and he came out with 560rwhp, but it definitely feels like 580rwhp i'd say. So yea, the 3.4 has its place in certain setups but you need to be cranking that thing to like 23psi or higher for it to be worth it to switch to it over the 2.3. And for a blower thats half a liter smaller putting out close to the same power with less boost, i'd say the whipple is better than the KB, but thats just by my reasoning. All in all, its better than an eaton. lol

To Furinox: Why the switch? And whats the current setup right now

I didn't like the way the vortech worked/built power. Right now I have a ported eaton with a 2.93 upper and 4 lb lower.
Furinox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jrrhd73must
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
10-02-2015 09:17 PM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
ChampInSD
5.0L GT S550 Tech
13
10-02-2015 04:55 AM
MustangForums Editor
General Tech
0
09-25-2015 06:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Power curve: Centri vs. Roots?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.