4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

T-Trim Numbers In!!!!! The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2010, 06:23 PM
  #11  
Dteal23
3rd Gear Member
 
Dteal23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 681
Default

thats crazy high for your mods... but then again dynos are diff.
Dteal23 is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:25 PM
  #12  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Originally Posted by Kerns
Ditto, they are amazing and virtually unpeggable. In a 3" housing they support up to 650RWHP and if you do start to hit more then that, you just upgrade to 3.5" piping instead.
Yep^^^^^^^^
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:26 PM
  #13  
Kerns
4th Gear Member
 
Kerns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,478
Default

You should race MustangMan00 to see how close the race is... If the numbers are correct (or should I say consistent with other dynojet numbers) you should literally put busses on him.
Kerns is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:28 PM
  #14  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Default

He made 288 with the cams which is pretty accurate and it looks like the same place for this dyno. I would say his numbers are "normal."
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:31 PM
  #15  
Kerns
4th Gear Member
 
Kerns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,478
Default

Originally Posted by WannaBeGearHead
He made 288 with the cams which is pretty accurate and it looks like the same place for this dyno. I would say his numbers are "normal."
Only problem I see with the numbers is he essentially picked up 170RWHP on 7-8PSI which means he is getting about 21.3-24.2RWHP per lb of boost... Most people say you get roughly 15RWHP per lb of boost.

Last edited by Kerns; 05-19-2010 at 06:38 PM.
Kerns is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:41 PM
  #16  
945LSTANG
6th Gear Member
 
945LSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,347
Default

great numbers! congrats!
945LSTANG is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:42 PM
  #17  
vanquish
4th Gear Member
 
vanquish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: asdf
Posts: 1,600
Default

What is the criteria for having to switch to a blow-thru setup?

I have an S strim at 10 psi with an SCT BA3000 draw-thru that runs well. If I put a T trim on I need to switch to blow-thru?
vanquish is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:42 PM
  #18  
2000AZ5.0GT
5th Gear Member
 
2000AZ5.0GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,731
Default

it's really not crazy high for his mods. The T trim is a great blower, intercooled it is astonnishing, not to mention, the cooler the OP has is huge, most likely very efficient, almost too efficient.

I was running 600+ rwhp on my T-trim with a 3.33" pulley, that's a ton (granted I was on an underdriven Crank pulley so I could run higher RPM).

so yeah, a 3.33" on a stock block is impressive.
2000AZ5.0GT is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:35 PM
  #19  
0949er
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
0949er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,909
Default

Originally Posted by vanquish
What is the criteria for having to switch to a blow-thru setup?

I have an S strim at 10 psi with an SCT BA3000 draw-thru that runs well. If I put a T trim on I need to switch to blow-thru?
I would think so man. The t-trim is not a baby blower haha, this thing is killer. Just take my numbers for example. Im telling the tuner after each run that I want lower numbers lol, so with him keeping my power down as much as possible, Im still crankin past 450 on a semi-retarted system.

He says that it moves so much air that it just gets too much turbulence from the air-filter side to get a good reading, just too much fluctuation

to the guys doubting numbers:

I assure you this is REAL rwhp we are talking about, lol. I would say that Its pretty efficient, just look how big it is. I dont care what your GF says, SIZE MATTERS :-p (thats a joke btw lol)
0949er is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:42 PM
  #20  
Kerns
4th Gear Member
 
Kerns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,478
Default

Originally Posted by 0949er
I would think so man. The t-trim is not a baby blower haha, this thing is killer. Just take my numbers for example. Im telling the tuner after each run that I want lower numbers lol, so with him keeping my power down as much as possible, Im still crankin past 450 on a semi-retarted system.

He says that it moves so much air that it just gets too much turbulence from the air-filter side to get a good reading, just too much fluctuation

to the guys doubting numbers:

I assure you this is REAL rwhp we are talking about, lol. I would say that Its pretty efficient, just look how big it is. I dont care what your GF says, SIZE MATTERS :-p (thats a joke btw lol)
We all know that T-Trims are efficient and powerful blowers, I'm just surprised that you are putting down 450+ on 7-8psi. On 10PSI with your cams I could easily see it. I would just really like to see you take it to the 1/8th and/or race MustangMan00... With 457rwhp you should trap around 93mph in the 1/8th.
Kerns is offline  


Quick Reply: T-Trim Numbers In!!!!! The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.