Have anything to say about the BBK-5012?
08-04-2010, 06:21 PM
#11
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
IMO that intake would be a severe waste of money. I know what they are TYRING to do with that( Independent Throttle Bodies) But they are not going to pull it off. All they are doing with that intake is creating a bottle neck at the heads and the throttle body.
Im now convinced that BBK has no engineers working for them.
Im now convinced that BBK has no engineers working for them.
08-04-2010, 07:34 PM
#13
Underboss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
08-04-2010, 11:37 PM
#14
Resident Ford Troll
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,717
IF you google search the 5012 it comes with with a box-r lookin intake from the 302...
I know what intake you guys are talkin about however, with the IMRCs like 96-98 cobras... either way, without a heads/cam/boost car...its money wasted
I know what intake you guys are talkin about however, with the IMRCs like 96-98 cobras... either way, without a heads/cam/boost car...its money wasted
08-05-2010, 08:18 AM
#15
Its supposed to be an intake for the 2v like the FR500 intake manifold for the 4v with butterflies that open up in the manifold to go from long runner to short runner from my understanding.
