4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Sorry for no pic of the day but other good news

Old 08-14-2010, 03:43 AM
  #31  
0949er
4th Gear Member
 
0949er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,909
Default

I can see you hitting about 315 tops w/ heads+cams (but also the supporting mods like LT's, o/r midpipe, etc)

And what do you guys keep talking about when you stay "stock bottom end" You are not worrying about messing your motor up are you? Because If you are worried about 325 rwhp on the stock bottom end, then I am crapping my pants right now lol ;-)
0949er is offline  
Old 08-14-2010, 08:07 AM
  #32  
devongarver
5th Gear Member
 
devongarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,994
Default

Originally Posted by 0949er
I can see you hitting about 315 tops w/ heads+cams (but also the supporting mods like LT's, o/r midpipe, etc)

And what do you guys keep talking about when you stay "stock bottom end" You are not worrying about messing your motor up are you? Because If you are worried about 325 rwhp on the stock bottom end, then I am crapping my pants right now lol ;-)
They arew worried about the rpms required to get to that hp level, the rods wont like it much....
devongarver is offline  
Old 08-14-2010, 10:51 AM
  #33  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Default

Originally Posted by devongarver
They arew worried about the rpms required to get to that hp level, the rods wont like it much....
Exactly. With heads, cams and his bullitt intake and the 320hp goal to get close to that the shift point could end up being very high which the stock rods won't like and probably won't hold up long.
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 08-14-2010, 05:04 PM
  #34  
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
nickmckinney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 570
Default

Originally Posted by H0SS302
With the trickflow heads its VERY easy.I havnt seen a cars result YET hit under 320 with trickflow heads and stage 2 cams.. With h/c/i this guy is gonna be hitting good numbers for sure.

If you are 100% going to stay on a stock shortblock without a piston notch then you can get another 10-20RWHP with the TFS heads below 7000RPM as you can fit a better cam, but once you notch the piston the playing field gets leveled really fast with the PI. As for easily hitting 320RWHP with TFS heads, that has not been my experience nor of most of the dyno shops I deal with.
nickmckinney is offline  
Old 08-14-2010, 05:21 PM
  #35  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default

Don't say that!!! lol
mustangmancp is offline  
Old 08-15-2010, 07:09 PM
  #36  
crash
BrandofPoop
 
crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,835
Default

I do like his taste in cars though
crash is offline  
Old 08-15-2010, 11:10 PM
  #37  
H0SS302
6th Gear Member
 
H0SS302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
Default

Originally Posted by nickmckinney
If you are 100% going to stay on a stock shortblock without a piston notch then you can get another 10-20RWHP with the TFS heads below 7000RPM as you can fit a better cam, but once you notch the piston the playing field gets leveled really fast with the PI. As for easily hitting 320RWHP with TFS heads, that has not been my experience nor of most of the dyno shops I deal with.
Unless shops are fooling with the dynos there is plenty of numbers out on the net now. One guy on moddedmustangs put down 350 through an auto..
H0SS302 is offline  
Old 08-15-2010, 11:15 PM
  #38  
PurpleIcedGT
6th Gear Member
 
PurpleIcedGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
Default

Originally Posted by mustangmancp
Don't say that!!! lol

^Sh*tting his pants right now....
PurpleIcedGT is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 01:12 AM
  #39  
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
tbirdscwd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,039
Default

Originally Posted by H0SS302
Unless shops are fooling with the dynos there is plenty of numbers out on the net now. One guy on moddedmustangs put down 350 through an auto..

lol, I think nick knows about that car. I'm pretty sure he sent that guy a set of custom cams for it before anyone was making TFS specific cams.
tbirdscwd is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 12:31 PM
  #40  
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
nickmckinney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 570
Default

Yes those are my cams in that car. Its actually 340RWHP SAE give or take (all the charts I have are 346RWHP STD) However it was already at 330RWHP with PI heads before the ported TFS head swap..........He later went to a lower compression shortblock and with the TFS intake its now at 330RWHP or so.

I have another guy crying his eyes out at 290RWHP on a 5.4 (other shop) ported TFS head motor with Eddy intake and adapter plates on Comp270AH cams. We installed a set of my cams and got it up to 330RWHP. He has spent $8K already, I told him to make any real power it needs a Logan intake but thats beyond his hurting wallet at the moment. There are many many more stories like this one.

These are race heads with massive intake flow and need to be used under conditions that don't choke them down, which unless its a roots style blower means turning some serious RPM. You install a plastic PI intake on TFS heads you might as well run a 300 lift cam. The TFS heads at 300 lift are already outflowing the plastic intake.
nickmckinney is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djbigskrilla
2005-2014 Mustangs
24
09-20-2022 01:04 AM
drfister
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
05-03-2018 10:38 PM
Faolan65
Arizona Regional Chapter
0
08-25-2015 09:24 AM
Stilz
New Member Area
3
08-19-2015 06:17 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Sorry for no pic of the day but other good news



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.