4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Track results for tonight!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2010, 04:13 PM
  #21  
ddmsgtr1
4th Gear Member
 
ddmsgtr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,236
Default

How far are you from atco? That's where I normally go, I'm breaking in a clutch at the moment, but in october it's gonna be sweet there.
ddmsgtr1 is offline  
Old 09-05-2010, 05:15 AM
  #22  
nascrchi
3rd Gear Member
 
nascrchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Posts: 875
Default

Honestly, I believe your car should be going faster than a 13.5.

With drag radials you'll shave, if you can drive, .3 off the slip on the 1/4 mi.

This is nothing to brag about, but I hit 13.9 with a stock 04gt motor and 3:27s & full exhaust. I have the nt555r but I don't have mods like you do. You have alot of bolt-ons. With better gears and upper/lower control arms I should be around 13.5.
nascrchi is offline  
Old 09-05-2010, 09:20 AM
  #23  
kugzgt
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
kugzgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,472
Default

Originally Posted by ddmsgtr1
How far are you from atco? That's where I normally go, I'm breaking in a clutch at the moment, but in october it's gonna be sweet there.
I'm like 2 hours from atco
kugzgt is offline  
Old 09-05-2010, 03:12 PM
  #24  
ddmsgtr1
4th Gear Member
 
ddmsgtr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by nascrchi
Honestly, I believe your car should be going faster than a 13.5.

With drag radials you'll shave, if you can drive, .3 off the slip on the 1/4 mi.

This is nothing to brag about, but I hit 13.9 with a stock 04gt motor and 3:27s & full exhaust. I have the nt555r but I don't have mods like you do. You have alot of bolt-ons. With better gears and upper/lower control arms I should be around 13.5.
Like I said, with drag radials and some suspension, you have at least a high 12 sec. car, even with the 3.55's.
ddmsgtr1 is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 02:20 AM
  #25  
nascrchi
3rd Gear Member
 
nascrchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Posts: 875
Default

Originally Posted by ddmsgtr1
Like I said, with drag radials and some suspension, you have at least a high 12 sec. car, even with the 3.55's.
Yea I know you said that.

I still think his trap should be higher even though he doesn't hook off the line. I would like to know how OP does after some sticky tires and suspenison work.
nascrchi is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 10:47 AM
  #26  
ddmsgtr1
4th Gear Member
 
ddmsgtr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,236
Default

I agree it's a bit low, that's what I trapped hitting my 13.1. But I think maybe some powershifting could solve that problem. He's definitely got the power to trap higher than that.
ddmsgtr1 is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 11:44 AM
  #27  
stangalator
4th Gear Member
 
stangalator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by ddmsgtr1
I agree it's a bit low, that's what I trapped hitting my 13.1. But I think maybe some powershifting could solve that problem. He's definitely got the power to trap higher than that.
Yea, i was thinking the same thing. Its not a big deal, i was just comparing times to myself.

I mean i did remove my spare tire and rear seats to cut down on race weight but that shouldn't make up for cams and 40 horses. Would the 4.10s really make up that much difference?

EDIT:
I have the sumitomos too, they still suck even at 315 wide, haha. Best 60' i have ever gotten was 2.06 or something w/ stock suspension minus flsfc.

Last edited by stangalator; 09-06-2010 at 11:49 AM.
stangalator is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 12:04 PM
  #28  
kugzgt
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
kugzgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,472
Default

i was talking to locals the track that are there all the time and they were saying that the track was really ****ty friday night and my buddy that was running his 02 gt with 4.10s and full exhaust and intake usually ran 13.7s was only running 14.1
kugzgt is offline  
Old 09-06-2010, 12:04 PM
  #29  
kugzgt
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
kugzgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,472
Default

Originally Posted by stangalator
Yea, i was thinking the same thing. Its not a big deal, i was just comparing times to myself.

I mean i did remove my spare tire and rear seats to cut down on race weight but that shouldn't make up for cams and 40 horses. Would the 4.10s really make up that much difference?

EDIT:
I have the sumitomos too, they still suck even at 315 wide, haha. Best 60' i have ever gotten was 2.06 or something w/ stock suspension minus flsfc.
i def think ur 4.10s make up for alot
kugzgt is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 12:06 AM
  #30  
ddmsgtr1
4th Gear Member
 
ddmsgtr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,236
Default

That's why I like atco. Especially if you go on gambler's night, you're gonna have a pretty good track to work with.
ddmsgtr1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Track results for tonight!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.