4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

I know this isn't exactly the place, but...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2010, 10:33 AM
  #11  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Yea, my buddy has a 347 stroker in his 65 fastback and his came out of the crate with 420hp and its carbed. I think you'd be fine with either a 347 stroker or going 5.8 based and getting a 408 stroker. Up to you though. For twisties i'd go with the 5.0 based small block instead of a mid-block 5.8 based. Lighter weight.
teej281 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 10:36 AM
  #12  
PurpleIcedGT
6th Gear Member
 
PurpleIcedGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
Default

I'd rather have AIDS then buy an overpriced 15 year old car that was beat to sh*t. Take your time finding the car that you WANT and can AFFORD. If you don't you'll end up pissing your money away. My .02
PurpleIcedGT is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 10:36 AM
  #13  
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,696
Default

Agree with with pretty much everone.. If you continue to look I'm pretty sure you can a nicer car as a project. Have you thought about fixing up a old foxbody??
Soldier GT is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 10:41 AM
  #14  
Spilotro
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Spilotro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OK
Posts: 363
Default

I'm not a fan of how the fox bodies look at all. I think I'm just going to keep saving for the Mach 1, it'll be worth it. I've wanted that car since it came out.
Spilotro is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 12:19 PM
  #15  
ddmsgtr1
4th Gear Member
 
ddmsgtr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,236
Default

Given the shape you say the car is in, if it had the suspension already taken care of (tubular front, aftermarket rear UCA/LCA, shocks/struts) and geared towards what you wanna do, I would CONSIDER doing it as a rolling chassis. But it would have to be perfect for what I wanted to do.
ddmsgtr1 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 12:24 PM
  #16  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Nevermind...if it were a 4.6 I would say buy it. Since it's a 5.0, might wanna start with something different as when you start making lots of power, the stock block likes to act like a banana and split.
teej281 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 03:04 PM
  #17  
kugzgt
5th Gear Member
 
kugzgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,472
Default

Bad investment.
kugzgt is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 03:28 PM
  #18  
JC316
4th Gear Member
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,925
Default

$2000 is a ripoff. I sold my 4V swapped 96 with 175K on it for $2500 and it was in really good shape.
JC316 is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 04:00 PM
  #19  
Spilotro
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Spilotro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OK
Posts: 363
Default

Thanks for all the feedback!

Screw that, I'm sticking to the original plan:

Spilotro is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 04:04 PM
  #20  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

I will hate you forever if you get an azure blue Mach...my favorite second to only an oxford white one.
teej281 is offline  


Quick Reply: I know this isn't exactly the place, but...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.