4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Which to get first? Tuner or 70mm TB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2010, 07:45 PM
  #11  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

As to bolt-ons, do the exhaust (2-1/2" X or H-pipe, and catback) first, then tuner, then gears (which I guess you already have), then TB and plenum (if you can only do one do the plenum first), then tweak your tune to the highest octane available. This will get you to 250 to 260rwHP.

An after market CAI will do nothing but lighten your wallet. UDPs, aluminum driveshaft, lightweight flywheel, etc. will free up some torque to the rear wheels while accelerating--but beyond that there's not much that's worthwhile without cracking open the cam covers or going to one or another form of bolt-on power adder (s/c, turbo, juice)...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:55 PM
  #12  
tightdogal
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tightdogal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 3,411
Default

I have exhaust already. catted xpipe with Magna's. And gears.

Yeah that's that I want to do more mods, but I don't want to go blown with this car...I just want to go to the track and maybe hit mid-13's and be like "yay"
tightdogal is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:05 PM
  #13  
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
MU71L4710N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
Default

Originally Posted by ct_white_stang
Did you buy the car with 3.73's in it? It might already have a tune, is your speedo off?
doubtful that would be the case. someone would have unmarried it and gotten a speedcal for 90 bucks. saves money that way unless the owner was an idiot.
MU71L4710N is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:06 PM
  #14  
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
MU71L4710N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
Default

you should easily be able to hit 13's now...
MU71L4710N is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:08 PM
  #15  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by tightdogal
I have exhaust already. catted xpipe with Magna's. And gears.

Yeah that's that I want to do more mods, but I don't want to go blown with this car...I just want to go to the track and maybe hit mid-13's and be like "yay"
Do you wish to tune it yourself, or pay to have it done?

The other change I would recommend, based on my recent experience, is to upgrade the fuel injectors to the FRPP 24lb/h EV6 units. I have not been up on the rollers since installing these, however the butt dyno and my G-Tech both report a good kick in the pants at WOT and in the 4500-6000 rpm range.

You will need to change the injector low and high slopes, breakpoint, and minimum pulse width settings in the tune to use these...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:10 PM
  #16  
tightdogal
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tightdogal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 3,411
Default

Yeah, I just want to take this car to the track once. Maybe twice...knowing me though, I'll get hooked on it and go every weekend. ;-p Tracks are fun.
tightdogal is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:19 PM
  #17  
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
Do you wish to tune it yourself, or pay to have it done?

The other change I would recommend, based on my recent experience, is to upgrade the fuel injectors to the FRPP 24lb/h EV6 units. I have not been up on the rollers since installing these, however the butt dyno and my G-Tech both report a good kick in the pants at WOT and in the 4500-6000 rpm range.

You will need to change the injector low and high slopes, breakpoint, and minimum pulse width settings in the tune to use these...
Cliff,
Are you saying that you don't think your stock injectors were providing enough fuel for your set-up?
TRUEBLUE3934 is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:43 PM
  #18  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by TRUEBLUE3934
Cliff,
Are you saying that you don't think your stock injectors were providing enough fuel for your set-up?
Not exactly,

I think that the EV6 injectors are providing a quicker action, and an improved spray pattern (improved vapourisation), that has improved combustion efficiency. As an evolution of Bosch's injector technology the lighter weight pintle and lower saturation coil allow more precise fuel control.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 10:00 PM
  #19  
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
Not exactly,

I think that the EV6 injectors are providing a quicker action, and an improved spray pattern (improved vapourisation), that has improved combustion efficiency. As an evolution of Bosch's injector technology the lighter weight pintle and lower saturation coil allow more precise fuel control.
Interesting... I would be currious to see what you find on the dyno if you get a pull done. I'm always interested in what may be restricting me from better efficiency.
TRUEBLUE3934 is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 10:21 PM
  #20  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by TRUEBLUE3934
Interesting... I would be currious to see what you find on the dyno if you get a pull done. I'm always interested in what may be restricting me from better efficiency.
Not worth $75 to me at this point...
cliffyk is offline  


Quick Reply: Which to get first? Tuner or 70mm TB?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.