4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Trick Flow 44cc Heads vs 4v Heads

Old 12-08-2010, 11:28 AM
  #11  
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
MU71L4710N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
Default

i would 4v swap it. you should be able to find a complete cobra motor in a junk yard for far less than 2 grand, you can get the heads cleaned up, i wouldnt bother with cams unless your power levels absolutely require it which i doubt they do, and don't forget you can sell the extra gt parts and cobra shortblock to recoup $.
MU71L4710N is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 12:18 PM
  #12  
945LSTANG
6th Gear Member
 
945LSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,347
Default

Originally Posted by Kerns
B heads outflow C heads... and 03/04 Cobra heads are C heads. Although 03/04 Cobra C heads do outflow B heads, but only marginally so. Not sure it would be worth the extra 700-800$ for a very minor difference in flow numbers.
im very curious as to where you are getting your information from because 03 cobras definitely do not have a c casting head...
945LSTANG is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 12:28 PM
  #13  
Stevecooper
3rd Gear Member
 
Stevecooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 912
Default

Originally Posted by Kerns
B heads outflow C heads... and 03/04 Cobra heads are C heads. Although 03/04 Cobra C heads do outflow B heads, but only marginally so. Not sure it would be worth the extra 700-800$ for a very minor difference in flow numbers.
C/Tumble Port: (99/01 Cobra, 99 Lincoln Continental)

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=4v+modular+heads

Stevecooper is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 03:11 PM
  #14  
Kerns
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Kerns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,478
Default



03/04 Cobra heads are tumble port design just like the 99/01 heads. They are essentially a revised C head.
Kerns is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 03:30 PM
  #15  
Jay-rod427
3rd Gear Member
 
Jay-rod427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KS
Posts: 555
Default

I just bought a complete 96' MarkVIII engine and a set of Modmax H beam rods for $400, an intake and basic rebuild will not be anywhere near the $2,600 mark for TFS. You wouldn't need high lift valve springs or any of that unless you are wanting to build a full race engine as the 4V heads do not require the high lift cams to achieve higher flow.
Jay-rod427 is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 03:32 PM
  #16  
schmallz
2nd Gear Member
 
schmallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 392
Default

I don't know what your driving habits are or if this your daily driver, but a 600RWHP DOHC motor will be much more civilized and streetable than a 2v motor in the same ball park.

Are you sticking with the vortech? Or are you thinking about another power adder, like a Kennebell or Turbo or?
schmallz is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 03:33 PM
  #17  
schmallz
2nd Gear Member
 
schmallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by Jay-rod427
I just bought a complete 96' MarkVIII engine and a set of Modmax H beam rods for $400, an intake and basic rebuild will not be anywhere near the $2,600 mark for TFS. You wouldn't need high lift valve springs or any of that unless you are wanting to build a full race engine as the 4V heads do not require the high lift cams to achieve higher flow.
Exactly, the SOHC Trick Flow heads with high lift cams will have an extremely rough idle, but that might be what he wants.
schmallz is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 03:49 PM
  #18  
BraMas
5th Gear Member
 
BraMas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 4,634
Default

what lift are you going by when you say the B head outflows the C head? if you are going by the .500 as your determination than you would also have to apply that logic to the NPI VS PI and you could say the NPI out flows the PI and therefore is a better head but everyone know the NPI is a POS head.
There are so many variables for each build that determine what is the right choice not just flow at .500
Most 4V people agree that the C head is the better option when it comes to the 4V
just my .02 but MF is the last place you need to ask this kind of technical question. you are better off over on SVTP or the Corral for real accurate info
BraMas is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 03:54 PM
  #19  
2000AZ5.0GT
5th Gear Member
 
2000AZ5.0GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,731
Default

Originally Posted by schmallz
I don't know what your driving habits are or if this your daily driver, but a 600RWHP DOHC motor will be much more civilized and streetable than a 2v motor in the same ball park.

Are you sticking with the vortech? Or are you thinking about another power adder, like a Kennebell or Turbo or?

and you know this how? I daily drived a 600rwhp+ 2v with a vortech for 2+ years, it wasn't that rough of an idle.
2000AZ5.0GT is offline  
Old 12-08-2010, 04:31 PM
  #20  
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
 
mustangmancp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Default

I wouldn't think a s/c would be that rough...i think it'd be the cams/intake/gear combo etc..

LIke my cars a lil more rough off idle, but then again i have a pretty big set of 2v cams and such.
mustangmancp is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Trick Flow 44cc Heads vs 4v Heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.