MustangForums.com

4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Blower cams, worth it without ported heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-2010, 02:23 PM
  #31  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default
Plus boost and stock valvesprings and aftermarket cams just seems like...yikes. Lol but I wouldn't know. Just saying
teej281 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-29-2010, 02:14 AM
  #32  
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
tbirdscwd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,039
Default
I think that makes much more of a difference for the turbo guys that need a much higher seat pressure compared to blower and NA guys due to the increased exhaust pressure. For a centri setup, makes sense that as long as the valvetrain can handle the rpm (up to 6500) and the lift (up to .550") that there wouldn't be an issue.
tbirdscwd is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1994-1995 ODBII Port
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Bad cylinder?
Dathan
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
4
10-05-2015 05:52 AM
So who wins
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
Centerforce Clutch, will a exedy flywheel work?
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
Hello, new user with an older Mustang and a question
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
Tags
Back to Subforum
4.6L General Discussion
View Next Unread
Suspension Question




Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Blower cams, worth it without ported heads?


Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.