Hangwire

Ok I don't like FWD at all. As for a V6 not matching 4.0 mustang power if were talking stock for stock thats not necessarily a bad thing at all. Bolt-on GT's(Aside from the '11 5.0) dont do anything at all for me, so its all relative.
Would love to see what it would do with a mild turbo and a few grand into the suspension.

Alec

Gotcha I'm just saying in my opinion it's a pretty underpowered engine and I don't think there's much potential with it (not that there's much with the 4.0 either, without big $$). And I'd imagine if you upped the power the torque steer would be a p.i.t.a. also. If it was a RWD car it would be a LOT more appealing to me.

badlx87

70 chevelle, 69 firebird, 70 roadrunner/satellite, 99 TA/camaro.... but i'll probably always stick to mustangs. Their all i've ever known, i'm only 20 though.

turbo232

that car does not have that power with stock internals. it is sick, but it is either built or a lie.

boduke0220

either an all motor high rpm k20 honda hatch, an old boss 302 with a built high rpm motor and full griggs suspension setup for road courses. a whipple shelby slammed on some True forged wheels, and full bassani exhaust lol too many more to name

Harryman2002

S2K's have forged internals stock so im sure that is possible to do without building the motor.

ill_eagle94

'23 T Bucket with a built B18, turbo, and a GForce GF-5R Transmission.

H0SS302

yea theres no way hes running that boost with stock CR. No way in hell. Hes at least got some different pistons in there.

945LSTANG

h/c/i c6 z06

I'd sell the cobra in a heartbeat if I could get enough cash for the build.

Alec

I'd like to add an SRT8 Jeep and Challenger, SS Trailblazer and 2010 Camaro