4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

275/60/15 vs 275/50/15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2011, 12:53 PM
  #11  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Get a body shop to roll the fenders then. Also, what is your desired trap speed and what rpm are you comfortable trapping at? Because with the 28" tire it looks like you'll be able to trap around 140@7k rpm. And around like 120ish around 6k if I remember correctly. If you go with the stock height you'll be trapping like 120 or so at 7k.
teej281 is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 01:24 PM
  #12  
Jay-rod427
3rd Gear Member
 
Jay-rod427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KS
Posts: 555
Default

What backspacing on your wheels? 6.5 would prob hit the fender, 7.5 would fit inside.
Jay-rod427 is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 01:39 PM
  #13  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
Thread Starter
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

Im getting of Dimebag not sure on the backspacing, but more than likley there 5.5 or 6.5 I would imagine, I never heard of anyone with a new edge or sn95 running a 7.5
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 01:49 PM
  #14  
Jay-rod427
3rd Gear Member
 
Jay-rod427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KS
Posts: 555
Default

7.5" backspacing is not very common because they would hit the quad shocks/ and exhaust if they were there. And with so many people just putting on wheels and tires without suspension work it is not a common demand. The inner fender actually has a lot of room to move the tires in.

I run 27X10.50X15 with 6.5BS and they come very close to hitting the fender lip with the car only slightly lowered. When I get C/O's on it and put it to the ground I am going to have to use 7.5" BS wheels or narrow the whole rear end to be able to fit a taller tire.
Jay-rod427 is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 01:59 PM
  #15  
Repzard
4th Gear Member
 
Repzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: sttesuhcaxaT (The State you love to hate)
Posts: 1,360
Default

Originally Posted by Jay-rod427
7.5" backspacing is not very common because they would hit the quad shocks/ and exhaust if they were there. And with so many people just putting on wheels and tires without suspension work it is not a common demand. The inner fender actually has a lot of room to move the tires in.

I run 27X10.50X15 with 6.5BS and they come very close to hitting the fender lip with the car only slightly lowered. When I get C/O's on it and put it to the ground I am going to have to use 7.5" BS wheels or narrow the whole rear end to be able to fit a taller tire.
Great Info to know.
Repzard is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 02:01 PM
  #16  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
Thread Starter
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

Hmmmm .... So what ur saying is a 275/60/15 on a 6.5 bs with stock springs out back might be a problem?
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 03:23 PM
  #17  
Jay-rod427
3rd Gear Member
 
Jay-rod427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KS
Posts: 555
Default

What Brand and kind of tire? Some tires like Hoosier the sizes are quite a bit different than other brands on actual sizing specs. On stock springs though it will prob be fine, if it were lowered quite a bit, or really soft drag springs they might hit when the rear squats on launch. I am pretty sure that JayC runs a 28X10.50 on his.

I am not sure but I believe the SN95 and New Edge have the same fender dimensions.

A common 275/60/15 is about a 28X10.50, which is actually only 9.7 or so actual tread width. Look at the pics of mine with 6.5bs on a 10.5" tire especially the passenger side, they come very close to the inner fender lip, but since my current lowering springs don't squat much they don't hit. To go any taller or wider especially after lowering it more I will definately move them in.

[IMG][/IMG][IMG][/IMG]


I think you will be fine with a 275/60/15 on stock springs with 6.5bs wheels, but any future mods to the suspension may cause problems if you lower it at all.

Last edited by Jay-rod427; 06-17-2011 at 03:26 PM.
Jay-rod427 is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 03:40 PM
  #18  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

I run 275/50's
The 60's look goofy on our ride and does not provide much more sidewall
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 03:41 PM
  #19  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

BTW, running the 275/50 with a C spring
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 05:39 PM
  #20  
Repzard
4th Gear Member
 
Repzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: sttesuhcaxaT (The State you love to hate)
Posts: 1,360
Default

Originally Posted by lizzyfan
BTW, running the 275/50 with a C spring
Lizzy..You say you run C Springs.
Did you cut any coils off the backs?
Repzard is offline  


Quick Reply: 275/60/15 vs 275/50/15



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.