4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Lost all backpressure and low end torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2011, 01:38 PM
  #21  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

Originally Posted by SyNdicateZ
for those of you that seem to lose low end power because of going with off-road pipe you might want to get some gears to remedy the situation
anyone who buys a car without gears already in it should slap the previous owner lol
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 02:28 PM
  #22  
Moonshine
5th Gear Member
 
Moonshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wa
Posts: 2,293
Default

What the hell is goin on in here?
Moonshine is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 02:46 PM
  #23  
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by sn95_331_GT_ yellow
anyone who buys a car without gears already in it should slap the previous owner lol
I'd rather have a turbo (or positive displacement supercharger) with stock gears.
amoosenamedhank is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 03:05 PM
  #24  
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
tbirdscwd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,039
Default

Probly need to adjust the tune a bit too. Going from 4 cats to none and opening up the exhaust can definitely influence the car's need for fuel and timing.
tbirdscwd is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 03:53 PM
  #25  
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
 
Rockwell28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
Default

Who is being being labled as a troll mr. Moderator. Tbird that sounds more logical than some things said in th past on th subject. And its old purp
Rockwell28 is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 03:58 PM
  #26  
945LSTANG
6th Gear Member
 
945LSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,347
Default

^you ya big ole' bitch!
945LSTANG is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 04:01 PM
  #27  
945LSTANG
6th Gear Member
 
945LSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,347
Default

BTW, that was a joke rockwell. Don't take this one seriously like you usually do.
945LSTANG is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 04:04 PM
  #28  
PurpleIcedGT
6th Gear Member
 
PurpleIcedGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
Default

Originally Posted by Rockwell28
Who is being being labled as a troll mr. Moderator. Tbird that sounds more logical than some things said in th past on th subject. And its old purp
Pick on Lizzy and you got another thing coming Rock.


Secondly, whats old? I cant understand wtf you say so I politely ask wait....what?!?!
PurpleIcedGT is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 05:32 PM
  #29  
scottybaccus
2nd Gear Member
 
scottybaccus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by sn95_331_GT_ yellow
wrong

the reason hes most likely losing power is due to the resonance problem inherent with the SpinTechs (already stated)

if cars needed backpressure like you said, then top fuel dragsters would be running a full exhaust... which they obviously dont...

any car out there will not respond negatively to a DECREASE in BP but will suffer from an INCREASE...

NA cars will have a much less reduced increase from a reduction, FI cars LOVE taking all the BP away...

go drive a diesel truck with a stock exhaust and one with open pipes and see which one has more power...


It looks like you read one technical article about a particular muffler and set all your understanding on something fancy they said there.

I never said cars needed back pressure. I said that the placement of the torque curve is influenced by the rpm at which the engine builds exhaust (and intake) velocity that promotes scavenging. This is fluid dynamics 101. Gaseaous materials (air and exhaust) behave as a fluid. Restriction is a factor of orifice diameter AND length. There is a sweet spot for any fluid flow scenario where flow is maximized when volume matches flow capacity, creating a velocity that encourages suction (scavenging). In a fluid model, you would recognize this as a syphoning effect. You can't get a syphon flowing unless the volume fills the pipe and creates suction. Lesser volume results in the cavitation (turbulent spaces in the gas or fluid) and loss of suction that you see when you didn't pull enough fluid to fill the pipe. (low rpm, low volume, big pipes, lost scavenging, low torque). Suck hard enough on the hose to fill it with fluid and you get a natural suction effect from the resulting velocity of the fluid. This velocity is the momentum of the fluid that resists cavitation and promotes scavenging. (moderate rpm, moderate flow volume fills larger pipe, scavenging resumes, torque is increased). Now go further, have the engine begin to exceed that sweet spot, fluid (or exhaust gas) is being forced into the pipe, restriction limit is encountered where the fluid does not compress and volume can not exceed the capacity of the pipes. This increases as pipe diameter is decreased, OR if pipe length is increased. (Carb jets are tuned this way, same size orifice flows less when it is longer, look it up in any jetting catalog) The result is a sudden drop in the torque curve where the engine exceeds the flow capacity of the exhaust. (I just agreed with your back pressure point). (high rpm, flow capacity of pipes exceeded, torque falls off)
In summary, increase exhaust capacity and you still have the same range of scenarios, they just occur at a higher rpm. This is plain physics and beyond opinion. You aren't debating me, your debating scientific facts that apply in ang hydrodynamic scenario. It doesn't matter if it is fuel injected or carbureated. Naturally aspirated engines (not forced induction) obey the same physics.
Your examples are a miss. Top Fuel dragsters are using forced induction. This pushes the upper limit of the engines torque curve by raising the operating pressure of the exhaust system beyond what the engine could do naturally aspirated. They run really short pipes because they want nothing in the way of the gasses exiting the cylinders under this forced pressure and the rules do not require a full exhaust system. Some teams even tailor the angle of the zoomies to promote down force on the chassis during a run because the pressure out of the pipes is so high. Your diesel engine analaogy is incorrect also because a naturally aspirated diesel engine is running at a much higher compression ratio as a requirement of the fuel. This means much higher cylinder pressures when the exhaust valves open so the exhaust pressures in the same size pipe are higher than a gasoline engine. That only means that the diesel engine appreciates reduced restriction sooner. The higher torque already achieved in a diesel engine is a result of the higher cylinder pressures that it operates at.

Now what was this thread really about?
scottybaccus is offline  
Old 07-06-2011, 05:39 PM
  #30  
scottybaccus
2nd Gear Member
 
scottybaccus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 486
Default

OH yea, I remember. Increased exhaust flow can benefit any engine, however too much of an increase will result in a loss of LOW END torque as the torque curve is moved up in the rpm range. Go google any old hotrod magazine, exhaust catalog, tuning advice, How to Build a Small Block whatever, and you will get the same answer.

For a STREET car, too much is sometime really too much. You don't go to school or work at 6500 rpm. You need to build torque at 1500 rpm to leave a red light, unless you like tickets. Our OP here simply overshot his "Happy Place", and yes, opinions vary so your happy place might be somewhere else.
scottybaccus is offline  


Quick Reply: Lost all backpressure and low end torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.