4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Is there such a thing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2012, 08:48 AM
  #11  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by fastbackford351
Observation: I believe that an analog vacuum gauge still will tell you more about how your engine is running than any other single gauge.


Discuss.
^+1000 or so - Manifold vacuum is a very often overlooked diagnostic tool:

cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-15-2012, 11:13 AM
  #12  
flyboy1294
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
flyboy1294's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 112
Default

Sorry for the late reply.

Thank you for the info Moonshine and Fastback! I found a few YouTube videos on people using the Torque app with New Edge cars, so I guess it must work. I looked on Auto Meter's website though and they side the ecometer only works for 2005+ Mustangs? Hmm.

So, CliffyK, if I'm understanding you right, you are saying that the gauges have to make calculations based on other information to give MPG read outs and may not always be accurate? Would the A/F ratio be the main reason the gauge would be inaccurate? I'm also wanting to do a wide-band O2 sensor on my car just so I can see for myself that things are running smoothly, so in that case I could know what the A/F ratio was better than my PCM did...

Interesting discussion on the vacuum gauges. The original application was a bit before my time, but it is cool nonetheless.
flyboy1294 is offline  
Old 12-15-2012, 12:00 PM
  #13  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by flyboy1294
<snip>So, CliffyK, if I'm understanding you right, you are saying that the gauges have to make calculations based on other information to give MPG read outs and may not always be accurate? Would the A/F ratio be the main reason the gauge would be inaccurate? I'm also wanting to do a wide-band O2 sensor on my car just so I can see for myself that things are running smoothly, so in that case I could know what the A/F ratio was better than my PCM did.
The operating parameters that can be requested through the OBD2 (OnBoard Diagnostic, type 2) port are called PIDs, Parameter IDs. There are generic PIDs described by SAE publication J1979, and manufacturers PIDs defined by each manufacturer.

Automakers are only required to support a small subset of the generic PIDs, mostly those related to emissions compliance, and most consumer level devices, and software like "Torque", support only the generic PIDs--here is a list of the generic PIDs supported by our cars (New-Edge V8s):



This is mostly diagnostic data (hence the name OBD2) with little performance tuning value. The RPM, ignition timing, MAF rate and load are useful, and the short term fuel trims to some extent, but the others are really just interesting information. The narrowband O² voltage is of no value to performance tuning.

Note that the two values needed to guesstimate fuel economy, MPH and MAF flow, are there and also closed-loop/open-loop indication that can be used to infer AFR--using 14.7:1 for closed loop and a reasonable value (say 12.5:1) for open-loop. This is how the OBD2 "performance" tools calculate MPG.

A very few tools/devices, not cheap ones, do support the manufacturers PIDs. Some partially with built-in tables, others by using manufacturer specific personality modules.

FWIW here is a list of all PIDs supported by our cars. Once again note that it is 99.44% diagnostic stuff unrelated to performance tuning.

So, my bottom line on OBD2 PID monitoring systems is that they are great diagnostic tools, not THE ultimate tool but on worth having in your tool box. Other than that they are cute toys that will at first amuse you and impress your friends, and then become rapidly just a bit more interesting than watching mud dry...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 10:57 PM
  #14  
flyboy1294
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
flyboy1294's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
So, my bottom line on OBD2 PID monitoring systems is that they are great diagnostic tools, not THE ultimate tool but on worth having in your tool box. Other than that they are cute toys that will at first amuse you and impress your friends, and then become rapidly just a bit more interesting than watching mud dry...
I see. In that case I might invest in one of the more expensive monitoring systems just for diagnostic purposes. I live in a pretty rural area, and it is hard to find reputable shops to work on my vehicle when something goes wrong. So I find my tool box and knowledge base is ever expanding. Which may not be a bad thing. Thank you once again for the info!
flyboy1294 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
RCS02v6
New Member Area
4
09-29-2015 01:46 PM
GLOCKer
General Tech
0
09-28-2015 07:36 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
ThatJuanStang
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
4
09-25-2015 08:01 AM



Quick Reply: Is there such a thing?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.