The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
#21
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
Sorry Doodad, but i just don't think you can get there with the routine boltons. LTHs, CAI, charge motion delete (or whatever they are called), underdrive pulleys...there individual hp gains might add to 50 extra ponies, but when you put em all on at the same time it just don't add up that way.
if you want to get to 325-350 NA then I'd go with LTH and a set of Livernois ported heads (5.0 M & SF puts them at ~40rwhp increase). The ported heads will cost close to 1500 in exchange for the current ones. The LTHs are probly around $ 500-600 for a good set and can get you 20-25 at the wheel.
Figure base rwhp is 275 + 40 (ported heads) + 25 (LTH) - 15 ( because rwhp for bolt ons are not additive) and your at ~325
or you could just suck it up and get s/c and be in the 400-450 rwhp range
if you want to get to 325-350 NA then I'd go with LTH and a set of Livernois ported heads (5.0 M & SF puts them at ~40rwhp increase). The ported heads will cost close to 1500 in exchange for the current ones. The LTHs are probly around $ 500-600 for a good set and can get you 20-25 at the wheel.
Figure base rwhp is 275 + 40 (ported heads) + 25 (LTH) - 15 ( because rwhp for bolt ons are not additive) and your at ~325
or you could just suck it up and get s/c and be in the 400-450 rwhp range
#23
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
Yes, but you were testing on evolutions dyno. I am not saying anything bad about evo or anyone else. All I am saying is that numbers can be fudged. And people are in buisiness to sell parts.
I certainly wouldent call a comparison like that on evo's own dyno conclusive.
Many people have dyno'd high numbers with Brenspeed's tunes so something is up. It is too coincidental for me that most have seen at least 290-300 with Brents tune, and the one guy that only got 275 did so at Brenspeeds #1 competitor's shop.
Out of curiosity, was your brenspeed tune set up for the O/R H pipe?
I dont know, maybe I am too cynical.
I certainly wouldent call a comparison like that on evo's own dyno conclusive.
Many people have dyno'd high numbers with Brenspeed's tunes so something is up. It is too coincidental for me that most have seen at least 290-300 with Brents tune, and the one guy that only got 275 did so at Brenspeeds #1 competitor's shop.
Out of curiosity, was your brenspeed tune set up for the O/R H pipe?
I dont know, maybe I am too cynical.
#24
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
Just for the record, the JBA shorties only got the 21 hp because it was shorties + a tune. On a stock car a tune can be worth 15-20 hp BY ITSELF.
As far as Brenspeeds tune, theres nothing wrong with his tuning, I have his tune with my C&L and it is freakin awesome. Just remember that every car is different and yours might not have had 275 beofe the O/R H pipe. Also it has been said that the H pipe isnt the pipe to get for performance, you want the X, and even that is only worth 10 hp MAX.
As far as Brenspeeds tune, theres nothing wrong with his tuning, I have his tune with my C&L and it is freakin awesome. Just remember that every car is different and yours might not have had 275 beofe the O/R H pipe. Also it has been said that the H pipe isnt the pipe to get for performance, you want the X, and even that is only worth 10 hp MAX.
#25
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
ORIGINAL: Menace
If stock RWHP = 275 then there was definately something wrong with my Brenspeed tunes, as I was getting 274 rwhp WITH an O/R H-pipe.
If stock RWHP = 275 then there was definately something wrong with my Brenspeed tunes, as I was getting 274 rwhp WITH an O/R H-pipe.
275 is THE best rwhp dyno I've seen for a stock car. Most are around the 260- 265 mark. so if you got an extra 10 to 15 with an o/r h pope then I think you're doin pretty dam good.
#26
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
um. . . thats 21 rwhp by just adding the headers. . . not by adding both the intake and the tune and the headers at the same time . . .
otherwise. . .you couldn't say that the headers gave you that much power. . . u would have to say the headers AND the intake AND the tune added up to 21. . .
otherwise. . .you couldn't say that the headers gave you that much power. . . u would have to say the headers AND the intake AND the tune added up to 21. . .
#27
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
ORIGINAL: Black06GT40324
um. . . thats 21 rwhp by just adding the headers. . . not by adding both the intake and the tune and the headers at the same time . . .
otherwise. . .you couldn't say that the headers gave you that much power. . . u would have to say the headers AND the intake AND the tune added up to 21. . .
um. . . thats 21 rwhp by just adding the headers. . . not by adding both the intake and the tune and the headers at the same time . . .
otherwise. . .you couldn't say that the headers gave you that much power. . . u would have to say the headers AND the intake AND the tune added up to 21. . .
Each sticker adds linearly and constructively with the other stickers already present on the car...
#28
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
ORIGINAL: paco_pony
275 is THE best rwhp dyno I've seen for a stock car. Most are around the 260- 265 mark. so if you got an extra 10 to 15 with an o/r h pope then I think you're doin pretty dam good.
ORIGINAL: Menace
If stock RWHP = 275 then there was definately something wrong with my Brenspeed tunes, as I was getting 274 rwhp WITH an O/R H-pipe.
If stock RWHP = 275 then there was definately something wrong with my Brenspeed tunes, as I was getting 274 rwhp WITH an O/R H-pipe.
275 is THE best rwhp dyno I've seen for a stock car. Most are around the 260- 265 mark. so if you got an extra 10 to 15 with an o/r h pope then I think you're doin pretty dam good.
Yes, Brent tuned it for the H-pipe as I had the exhaust before the Intake & tune.
#29
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
ORIGINAL: mikefan20
Are you saying you think you will get 21rwhp from shorty headers, cuz i think you have as much chance getting that from a shorty antenna (sorry for being an ***) but on a seriouse note, I have not heard anything over 5rwhp from aftermarket shorty headers. Now it seems no more than 15 from LT's. Send me the dyno, if they posted it.
Are you saying you think you will get 21rwhp from shorty headers, cuz i think you have as much chance getting that from a shorty antenna (sorry for being an ***) but on a seriouse note, I have not heard anything over 5rwhp from aftermarket shorty headers. Now it seems no more than 15 from LT's. Send me the dyno, if they posted it.
(Under "get a clue" : The customers of a magazine are it's ADVERTISERS, not it's readers)
#30
RE: The cheapest way to put down around 325-350rwhp?
ORIGINAL: Black06GT40324
well Mr. *** . . . every JBA article in every 'Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords' Magazine has the JBA shorties for 05-06 GT at the top of the page. . . note: must have CAI and ability to tune . . . but yes. . . 21 rwhp, get the mag, see for yourself
help finding? p 131 of September issue of MM&FF
the website, http://www.jbaheaders.com/05mustangnew.asp shows the dyno of the longtubes at 23 rwhp. . . the mags say 21 for the shorties. . .
pick up your local MM&FF and see for yourself bubs. . .
ORIGINAL: mikefan20
Are you saying you think you will get 21rwhp from shorty headers, cuz i think you have as much chace getting that from a shorty antenna (sorry for being an ***) but on a seriouse note, I have not heard anything over 5rwhp from aftermarket shorty headers. Now it seems no more than 15 from LT's. Send me the dyno, if they posted it.
ORIGINAL: Black06GT40324
full bolt on's will put you there with the right tune. . .
full exhaust; i.e., headers, midpipe, and mufflers
Cold Air intake, perferably the C&L, personal preference
and a tuner, with a custom tune for 93 octane . . . im at about 300 with everything i listed but headers. . .
JBA shorties are good for 21 rwhp dyno tested in a mag. . . them with a tune, i should be at approx 321 or so. . .
and that is by far the cheapest way besides nitrous. . . :-) . . . IMO
full bolt on's will put you there with the right tune. . .
full exhaust; i.e., headers, midpipe, and mufflers
Cold Air intake, perferably the C&L, personal preference
and a tuner, with a custom tune for 93 octane . . . im at about 300 with everything i listed but headers. . .
JBA shorties are good for 21 rwhp dyno tested in a mag. . . them with a tune, i should be at approx 321 or so. . .
and that is by far the cheapest way besides nitrous. . . :-) . . . IMO
well Mr. *** . . . every JBA article in every 'Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords' Magazine has the JBA shorties for 05-06 GT at the top of the page. . . note: must have CAI and ability to tune . . . but yes. . . 21 rwhp, get the mag, see for yourself
help finding? p 131 of September issue of MM&FF
the website, http://www.jbaheaders.com/05mustangnew.asp shows the dyno of the longtubes at 23 rwhp. . . the mags say 21 for the shorties. . .
pick up your local MM&FF and see for yourself bubs. . .
But my shorty antenna does free up alot of wind resistance over that stock flag pole they come with.