5.0 needs to beat 4.6
#22
RE: 5.0 needs to beat 4.6
ORIGINAL: badtzmaru
I got you 91stang, I have corrected the years, 94-95's are 5.0's
ORIGINAL: 91stang
actually 96-98 are the slowest 4.6's
actually 96-98 are the slowest 4.6's
I got you 91stang, I have corrected the years, 94-95's are 5.0's
nice try... in 95 they did have the option of having a 4.6 in the mustangs
#25
RE: 5.0 needs to beat 4.6
ORIGINAL: 91stang
nice try... in 95 they did have the option of having a 4.6 in the mustangs
ORIGINAL: badtzmaru
I got you 91stang, I have corrected the years, 94-95's are 5.0's
ORIGINAL: 91stang
actually 96-98 are the slowest 4.6's
actually 96-98 are the slowest 4.6's
I got you 91stang, I have corrected the years, 94-95's are 5.0's
nice try... in 95 they did have the option of having a 4.6 in the mustangs
#27
RE: 5.0 needs to beat 4.6
my bad guys... told yall wrong
i could've sworn.. someone on here told me that and i guess didn't do my usual research
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/time...8/95/index.htm
i could've sworn.. someone on here told me that and i guess didn't do my usual research
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/time...8/95/index.htm
#28
RE: 5.0 needs to beat 4.6
94-95 were all 5.0, 96-98 were non pi headed 4.6's, with the 98 having a slight bump in power over the 96/97's due to a different exhaust setup i believe. the power diff is like 5 hp or something