5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

302 or 347

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2006, 05:54 PM
  #1  
tims 88 4
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tims 88 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,659
Default 302 or 347

hey guys whats up i dunno what i wanna do dunno if i want a 302 or 347 what do you guys think what kinds gas mileage does each get wihich is better for darg racing or street or both oi dunno please help
tims 88 4 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 05:57 PM
  #2  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: 302 or 347

Well, obviously the 347 is going to be better for drag.. added cubes means added power, etc. Also, the 347 will be less reliable than the 302. Not saying that 347's arent reliable becuase they are but they stock 302 is obviously not taking as much abuse. And the gas mileage will also be worse with the 347..obviously. It also depends on how you build it... are you building it for the street? strip? etc.
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 06:00 PM
  #3  
TAPOUT
2nd Gear Member
 
TAPOUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 261
Default RE: 302 or 347

Just do the 347 so you have no regrets.
TAPOUT is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 07:31 PM
  #4  
tims 88 4
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tims 88 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,659
Default RE: 302 or 347

ok im looking for a good daily motor but i also wanna try to run 12s in a conv
tims 88 4 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 08:55 PM
  #5  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default RE: 302 or 347

I don't think that you can have a streeter/daily driver and run 12's in a car that still gets 18-20 MPG, if the MPG is real important to you don't mod anything.
A 306 can easily get you into the 12's however.......
tinman is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 08:59 PM
  #6  
86HOGT
5th Gear Member
 
86HOGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,105
Default RE: 302 or 347

I bet my 347 will get at least 18 when it's done...she gets 24 now, used to get 33 with 2.73s...

A 306 that's built good will get into the 12s along with suspension and driveline upgrades and good tires.
86HOGT is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 11:53 PM
  #7  
tims 88 4
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tims 88 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,659
Default RE: 302 or 347

anyone think i can run 12-13s in a convertable with a 302
tims 88 4 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 11:59 PM
  #8  
gspfunk
5th Gear Member
 
gspfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,834
Default RE: 302 or 347

It'll take a lot of suspension work and chassis stiffening in addition to an H/C/I and bolt ons, but 12's might be obtainable.

I was gonna recommend a 331. It has a rod ratio closer to a 302 so it's more dependable, but you still have some added cubes. No replacement for displacement.

...or just go w/ a 351 and call it a day.
gspfunk is offline  
Old 03-30-2006, 12:08 AM
  #9  
tims 88 4
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tims 88 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,659
Default RE: 302 or 347

what is an h/c/i would sub frame connectors do or would iu need more im 17 and just tryin to set some future goals
tims 88 4 is offline  
Old 03-30-2006, 01:14 AM
  #10  
XPBaller
4th Gear Member
 
XPBaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,123
Default RE: 302 or 347

h/c/i is heads cam intake
XPBaller is offline  


Quick Reply: 302 or 347



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.