5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

3.55/3.73s and traction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2006, 06:54 PM
  #11  
89GTRed
5th Gear Member
 
89GTRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,228
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

no, but you wont be able to rotate your tires is the main problem if you dont have all the same size tires. I am planning on going the same route when i get some more cash. thinking prolly some 255s in the back and 225 up front.
89GTRed is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 07:00 PM
  #12  
89GTRed
5th Gear Member
 
89GTRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,228
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

Also from what i understand if you stick with 60 series tires they will also get taller the wider you go. I have read that 225/60/15 means
225=mm width
60=% if tire width equals tire height
15= of course 15 in rims
89GTRed is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 07:04 PM
  #13  
ZoSo15
2nd Gear Member
 
ZoSo15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 347
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

ORIGINAL: 89GTRed

Also from what i understand if you stick with 60 series tires they will also get taller the wider you go. I have read that 225/60/15 means
225=mm width
60=% if tire width equals sidewall height
15= of course 15 in rims
ZoSo15 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 07:16 PM
  #14  
Twisted
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Twisted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 3,768
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

Thanks for the good info, Red. I'm forming a game plan as we speak. I think I may just try to find a set of used rims and tires.

ZoSo15, what's with "sidewall?"

Twisted is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 08:34 PM
  #15  
Blue Oval
4th Gear Member
 
Blue Oval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,077
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

thats the aspect ratio. times that number by the width, divide by 100 and thats how tall the sidewall is
Blue Oval is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 08:37 PM
  #16  
89GTRed
5th Gear Member
 
89GTRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,228
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

thx zoso for the correction
89GTRed is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 08:39 PM
  #17  
89GTRed
5th Gear Member
 
89GTRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,228
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

the sidewall height is the height of your tire from the outide of your rim to the outside of your tire.
89GTRed is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 10:39 PM
  #18  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

taller=better traction
Tims 88GT is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 10:52 PM
  #19  
PRO50SC
The Rogue Mod
 
PRO50SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland Sucka's!!
Posts: 21,918
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

ORIGINAL: Twisted

I am just getting ready to have some gears put in, although am undecided on which ones. At any rate, as it is, my car gets no traction at even half throttle in first gear--with the stock 2.73s. I know that this problem will be exacerbated greatly with 3.55s or 3.73s. I am currently running a set of 15X7 Centerlines (that I am looking to swap out at some point), and Dunlop G/T Qualifiers size P215/60R15. My two questions are:

1)What can I do to improve traction now, and particularly when I get the new gears?
2)Are these Dunlops a decent tire, and the correct size?

Thanks everyone.
Dunlops suck. Any kinda street tire is not gonna hook. Buy some drag radials and have at it!!!
PRO50SC is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 10:54 PM
  #20  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: 3.55/3.73s and traction

^right
Tims 88GT is offline  


Quick Reply: 3.55/3.73s and traction



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.