Do Flowmasters need a break in?
04-05-2006, 06:04 PM
#12
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 452
RE: Do Flowmasters need a break in?
ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT
Flowmasters do not need to "break in". It is because of the cats... and its not because of the long tubes... I have never heard of long tubes not being as loud as shorties?
Flowmasters do not need to "break in". It is because of the cats... and its not because of the long tubes... I have never heard of long tubes not being as loud as shorties?
04-05-2006, 06:08 PM
#17
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 452
RE: Do Flowmasters need a break in?
ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT
OK.... well I am just saying I have never heard of shorties being louder than long tubes..... I might be wrong on that but I have never heard that before...
OK.... well I am just saying I have never heard of shorties being louder than long tubes..... I might be wrong on that but I have never heard that before...
04-05-2006, 06:09 PM
#18
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
RE: Do Flowmasters need a break in?
Well, if that is true that might be why my MAC LT's > MAC Pro-Chamber > American Thunder Flows wasnt really that loud... it could of been ALOT louder IMO.
04-05-2006, 06:13 PM
#19
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 452
RE: Do Flowmasters need a break in?
I'm not saying the cats aren't a contributing factor b/c they are. All I'm saying is I have heard 2 identical cars, same exhaust set up except for the headers, and the one w/ the l/t's being quieter. I was very surprised as well when I heard the diff between them.