5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2006, 10:21 AM
  #1  
GaryBisiniere
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
GaryBisiniere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 763
Default Heads

Im buildin a 306 and im woundering if i should go with the edelbrock performer rpm with 170 or 210 cc intake runners?
thanks
GaryBisiniere is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 10:27 AM
  #2  
myshifter
I ♥ Acer
 
myshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,364
Default RE: Heads

the 170's will give you a better throttle response and off-idle torque whereas the 210's have the capacity to be able to support the engine in the upper rpm range were the 170's will run out of velocity. On a small motor like the 306 I would stay with the 170's
myshifter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
mustangheaven
Motor Swap Section
3
01-03-2016 11:20 AM
kevsgt
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-09-2015 10:12 PM
tj@steeda
Florida Regional Chapter
0
09-30-2015 08:04 PM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
09-30-2015 03:48 AM



Quick Reply: Heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.