cobra vs. 5.0
#3
RE: cobra vs. 5.0
+1
I know the stock 0-60 time for the 93 cobra is 5.9, and the 89 5.0 is...something like 6.7 maybe...
correct me if I'm wrong. Heres where I get all of my stock car information..(to see where I size up to my friends)
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
I know the stock 0-60 time for the 93 cobra is 5.9, and the 89 5.0 is...something like 6.7 maybe...
correct me if I'm wrong. Heres where I get all of my stock car information..(to see where I size up to my friends)
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
#6
RE: cobra vs. 5.0
ORIGINAL: 92lxvert
The '93 has the hyper pistons (long lasting). 205 HP and 275 lb ft of torque at the crank...something like that.
I think the '89's had the forged internals. 225 HP 300 lb ft of torque.
The '93 has the hyper pistons (long lasting). 205 HP and 275 lb ft of torque at the crank...something like that.
I think the '89's had the forged internals. 225 HP 300 lb ft of torque.
#10
RE: cobra vs. 5.0
^^ +1
exactly wat tath said
they have basicaly the same parts, just "upgraded" left over from the GT40 parts bin.
all mustangs in 93 were suppose to get the goodies but stupid ford had to use the cobra name as a marketing item once again...
exactly wat tath said
they have basicaly the same parts, just "upgraded" left over from the GT40 parts bin.
all mustangs in 93 were suppose to get the goodies but stupid ford had to use the cobra name as a marketing item once again...