WELL I PULLED MY MUFFLERS OFF= MORE HP?
#21
RE: WELL I PULLED MY MUFFLERS OFF= MORE HP?
I found this...
MUFFLER SHOOTOUT:
Results based on 5.0 Mustang Magazine December 2002 issue (page 55). Test car is a ’90 Coupe with 370 HP and 11 second potential. A number of 66 pulls were made to compile this information. Where does your muffler stack up?
The results in HP order:
1.Flowtech Warlock (open) 374.2 hp/ 333.1 tq
2.Bassani Real Street 373.7 hp/ 333.8 tq
3.Hooker Maxflow 373.5 hp/ 333 tq
4.Borla XS 373.3 hp/ 332.6 tq
5.Magnaflow 372.8 / 332.5 tq
6.MAC 372.3 hp / 331.5 tq
7.Flowtech Afterburner 372.3 hp/ 330.1 tq
8.Hooker Aerochamber 372.1 hp/ 330.4 tq
9.Bassani 372 hp/ 333.5 tq
10.Spintech 371.6 hp/ 332.2 tq
11.Edelbrock Performer RPM 370.9 hp / 331.3 tq
12.Borla XR1 370 hp/ 334 tq
13.Flowtech Terminator 369.5 hp / 331.3 tq
14.Dynomax Ultra Flo 369.4 / 333.2 tq
15.Flowmaster 369.4 hp / 331.8 tq
16.Flowtech Warlock 366.3 hp / 325.3 tq
17.No muffs 365.2 hp / 330.1 tq
But again, you buy the exhaust for the sound you like, not the HP gain.
MUFFLER SHOOTOUT:
Results based on 5.0 Mustang Magazine December 2002 issue (page 55). Test car is a ’90 Coupe with 370 HP and 11 second potential. A number of 66 pulls were made to compile this information. Where does your muffler stack up?
The results in HP order:
1.Flowtech Warlock (open) 374.2 hp/ 333.1 tq
2.Bassani Real Street 373.7 hp/ 333.8 tq
3.Hooker Maxflow 373.5 hp/ 333 tq
4.Borla XS 373.3 hp/ 332.6 tq
5.Magnaflow 372.8 / 332.5 tq
6.MAC 372.3 hp / 331.5 tq
7.Flowtech Afterburner 372.3 hp/ 330.1 tq
8.Hooker Aerochamber 372.1 hp/ 330.4 tq
9.Bassani 372 hp/ 333.5 tq
10.Spintech 371.6 hp/ 332.2 tq
11.Edelbrock Performer RPM 370.9 hp / 331.3 tq
12.Borla XR1 370 hp/ 334 tq
13.Flowtech Terminator 369.5 hp / 331.3 tq
14.Dynomax Ultra Flo 369.4 / 333.2 tq
15.Flowmaster 369.4 hp / 331.8 tq
16.Flowtech Warlock 366.3 hp / 325.3 tq
17.No muffs 365.2 hp / 330.1 tq
But again, you buy the exhaust for the sound you like, not the HP gain.
#25
RE: WELL I PULLED MY MUFFLERS OFF= MORE HP?
thanks onyx.......but guy's you can't feel 3-5hp this felt like a 20hp gain...and buy what was stated i should have lost hp not gain it...
#26
RE: WELL I PULLED MY MUFFLERS OFF= MORE HP?
it might just feel faster because how loud it is. i think ud be more likely to gain hp by removing ur muffs with a really high hp car..
and yeah i would think SLP would be pretty high on that list, usually the resonators do better than the chambered muffs
and yeah i would think SLP would be pretty high on that list, usually the resonators do better than the chambered muffs
#27
RE: WELL I PULLED MY MUFFLERS OFF= MORE HP?
then why was i blowing the clamps off at the dyno...
ORIGINAL: OnyxCobra
it might just feel faster because how loud it is. i think ud be more likely to gain hp by removing ur muffs with a really high hp car..
and yeah i would think SLP would be pretty high on that list, usually the resonators do better than the chambered muffs
it might just feel faster because how loud it is. i think ud be more likely to gain hp by removing ur muffs with a really high hp car..
and yeah i would think SLP would be pretty high on that list, usually the resonators do better than the chambered muffs
#28
RE: WELL I PULLED MY MUFFLERS OFF= MORE HP?
ORIGINAL: grabbem88
then why was i blowing the clamps off at the dyno...
then why was i blowing the clamps off at the dyno...
ORIGINAL: OnyxCobra
it might just feel faster because how loud it is. i think ud be more likely to gain hp by removing ur muffs with a really high hp car..
and yeah i would think SLP would be pretty high on that list, usually the resonators do better than the chambered muffs
it might just feel faster because how loud it is. i think ud be more likely to gain hp by removing ur muffs with a really high hp car..
and yeah i would think SLP would be pretty high on that list, usually the resonators do better than the chambered muffs