5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

which would you pick??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2006, 11:16 PM
  #11  
Billymac76
2nd Gear Member
 
Billymac76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 225
Default RE: which would you pick??

ORIGINAL: nacanitihs

id go with a Kenne Bell SC (2.2L) they will run you about $3500 for the entire kit everything you need. and they are a twin screw that goes ontop of ur motor like the ones on newer cobras. check it out http://kennebell.net/superchargers/f...-flowzilla.htm this is what i would go with personally. read all about them on the site its pretty interesting.

and ive heard from alot of ppl on this site that the stock block can hold about up to 500hp

i second that.. there is nothing like the whine of a twin skrew..

kb is what i am hopping for in a few years to come
Billymac76 is offline  
Old 07-19-2006, 11:43 PM
  #12  
FiveLiterRiceEater
5th Gear Member
 
FiveLiterRiceEater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,524
Default RE: which would you pick??

if you're going strictly performance then theres no question, a turbo is the only way to go. why? theres not belt to drive the turbo, so it robs no power. the amount of power a turbo is going to give you is significantly higher than a super charger. plus, you can put 2 on as opposed to one s/c
FiveLiterRiceEater is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 12:29 AM
  #13  
BascoSauce
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
BascoSauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 285
Default RE: which would you pick??

Hmm.....5literriceeater, you got me thinkin, and kinda stirred up wat I was wondering before, the block can only hold around 500 unless u don't care if ur block cracks...but how much difference does a supercharger or turbo in terms of power when you can only put the engine to about 500 while keeping ther block in mind. So is it really worth getting the turbo to have "more potential power"?? I mean the supercharger has the whine, but the turbo has the better power. As I said earlier though, wat does that mean when they can both push the engines limits?? Does anyone know wat I mean??
BascoSauce is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 01:25 AM
  #14  
FiveLiterRiceEater
5th Gear Member
 
FiveLiterRiceEater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,524
Default RE: which would you pick??

it just depends on what supporting mods youll have done with the turbo kit.

like r. barn said, good up to 450 with light mods. besides you can always get a stronger block. hell if you wanted to, why not get the block first and build a hellacious engine?

i would get the turbo kit over a supercharger. although i am still thinking about putting an m112 on a 5.0, but not on the engine im building.



besides who needs a supercharger whine when you got a blow off valve
FiveLiterRiceEater is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 01:41 AM
  #15  
BascoSauce
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
BascoSauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 285
Default RE: which would you pick??

ORIGINAL: FiveLiterRiceEater

it just depends on what supporting mods youll have done with the turbo kit.

like r. barn said, good up to 450 with light mods. besides you can always get a stronger block. hell if you wanted to, why not get the block first and build a hellacious engine?

i would get the turbo kit over a supercharger. although i am still thinking about putting an m112 on a 5.0, but not on the engine im building.



besides who needs a supercharger whine when you got a blow off valve
BascoSauce is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 01:44 AM
  #16  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: which would you pick??

http://www.hellionpowersystems.com/ there u go all ull ever need for the street add some head and a cam and ull be over satisfyed
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 02:02 AM
  #17  
LX 90
3rd Gear Member
 
LX 90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 791
Default RE: which would you pick??

if you get that turbo kit then you would need a new block to right?? and how much better would you be if you got a twin turbo??
LX 90 is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 02:04 AM
  #18  
hellas85stang
4th Gear Member
 
hellas85stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 1,082
Default RE: which would you pick??

sc power is there at wot,turbo a lil less..both are good
hellas85stang is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 02:07 AM
  #19  
r.barn
6th Gear Member
 
r.barn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,263
Default RE: which would you pick??

you dont need a new block, unless you start throwing crazy heads and cam and stroker kit in there.

with ported stock heads, mild cam and decent intake they make about 450rwhp at 10psi, thats fine for stock block.

Twin turbos are supposed to help with turbo lag, since you're not spooling up one big turbo but two small ones.
not as big deal these days since new turbo designs have almost done away turbo lag.
They do make some cool "turbo headers" though, that mount small turbo right on each of the exhaust headers.


ORIGINAL: LX 90

if you get that turbo kit then you would need a new block to right?? and how much better would you be if you got a twin turbo??
r.barn is offline  
Old 07-20-2006, 02:09 AM
  #20  
BascoSauce
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
BascoSauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 285
Default RE: which would you pick??

Uhhh idk wat happened to my post earlier, it only sent half of it, weird??


But about the new block, would I need to get a bigger one or just a reinforced block of some sort??



..and lx 90, a TT stang, wowwwww!





Oh yea rmodel, sorry I'm new too the car game as a lot of you already know from some of my comments/posts, but with the heads/cam how much hp boost is expected, cuz honestly I haven't the slightest!
BascoSauce is offline  


Quick Reply: which would you pick??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.