5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Does this article have any truth to it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2006, 11:55 AM
  #1  
VigCS
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
VigCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Frederick, Maryland.
Posts: 2,118
Default Does this article have any truth to it?

http://www.safetyforum.com/fordmustang/

Just curious, ran across it yesterday when I was looking for a part.
VigCS is offline  
Old 08-07-2006, 12:04 PM
  #2  
Hawk
3rd Gear Member
 
Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 551
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?

This article is true in regard to older model mustangs possibly exploding in a rear end collision. What could happen is, if the car were hit in the rear, the filler neck for the gas tank could shear off and cause a spark, thus igniting the gas tank and causing an explosion. If your familiar with these cars you probably could understand why if you just open the trunk and look at the gas tank setup.
Hawk is offline  
Old 08-07-2006, 12:11 PM
  #3  
7upedition
5th Gear Member
 
7upedition's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central New York
Posts: 3,850
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?

I read the whole article and my conclusion is that it is a ligitiment article mostly pertaining to the late model mustangs but continues to be a design flaw, however i dont believe there is significant room below the passenger seat for a fuel tank, anyhow, if your concerned over your mustangs safety, install a fuel system that mounts in the trunk and that will eliminate the ability of the fuel system to catch fire and raise it out of the typical crash zone. As HAWK said the neck is out there by itself and is matal so if its sheared it may spark, my suggestion is be aware of whos behind you and drive safely, keep a fire extinguisher in your car, and that driving any vehicle be it a dump truck, a semi, a truck, a suv, a car. or a motorcycle you are at risk, both fromt he road conditions as well as the other drivers on the road, and as tragic as those stories are you cant be afraid constantly of that happening. Personally I wouldn't worry about it too much on the 5.0's.
7upedition is offline  
Old 08-07-2006, 02:19 PM
  #4  
Twister
5th Gear Member
 
Twister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 2,645
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?

that article is a bunch of BS...20/20 ran with it not realizing that there were about 5 million Mustangs made with the gas tank like that and less than 100 ever caught on fire....The kid that caused the ruckuss was "test-driving" his Mustang on the freeway and it stalled in the fastlane. He was hit by a big truck doing the speed limit....he could have been in a Volvo, it still would have been a nasty wreck.
Twister is offline  
Old 08-07-2006, 02:23 PM
  #5  
Nadelle
3rd Gear Member
 
Nadelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 551
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?

in regards to rear end colisions, at highway speeds justa bout any car's gas tank will expode.

this is not just a ford only thing. all new cars are only crash tested up to 35mph, so if you stall on the freeway in your new volvo and someone slams into you goin 75-80, then its goodye.

any 80's car that get rear ended at high speed will suffer catostrophic effects no matter what car it is
Nadelle is offline  
Old 08-07-2006, 10:25 PM
  #6  
VigCS
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
VigCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Frederick, Maryland.
Posts: 2,118
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?

I'm not too worried about this happening, it just interested me when I ran across it.
VigCS is offline  
Old 08-07-2006, 10:40 PM
  #7  
samseed101
6th Gear Member
 
samseed101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,693
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?

This was a problem with Crown Vics for awhile. Finally, Ford admitted there was a problem and altered the gas tanks and surrounding parts so that it wouldn't be as bad.
samseed101 is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 02:09 AM
  #8  
Nadelle
3rd Gear Member
 
Nadelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 551
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?

by the way the crown vic is the only car in the world to be crash tested for rear end colissions at 75mph!!!

Nadelle is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 10:23 AM
  #9  
samseed101
6th Gear Member
 
samseed101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,693
Default RE: Does this article have any truth to it?


ORIGINAL: Nadelle

by the way the crown vic is the only car in the world to be crash tested for rear end colissions at 75mph!!!

That's probably because it's the most likely to be hit in the rear at 75. Many times, the car stopped on the side of the highway is a crown vic.
samseed101 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
2
10-05-2015 07:40 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
10-01-2015 05:13 PM
MustangForums Editor
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
1
10-01-2015 09:29 AM
MustangForums Editor
GT350 S550 Tech
1
09-29-2015 03:29 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
1
09-29-2015 03:23 PM



Quick Reply: Does this article have any truth to it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.