new taillights for 94
08-23-2006, 12:09 AM
#22
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,317
RE: new taillights for 94
ORIGINAL: MustangMan00
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
08-23-2006, 12:13 AM
#23
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,317
RE: new taillights for 94
yes, the second one is totally worse dude. Those look like they should be the tailights on the space shuttle.
But dont feel bad about them being called ricey. Some guys on here will call everything they see rice and as soon as they hear about someone calling a Civic or integra or something slow they start naming statistics only a ricer would know and taking up for the civics.
Whats that tell ya? Tells me they're a closet ricer. haha. 
I on the other hand am a full flegged domestic guy. Im all about v8's and rwd. A purist of sorts.
But dont feel bad about them being called ricey. Some guys on here will call everything they see rice and as soon as they hear about someone calling a Civic or integra or something slow they start naming statistics only a ricer would know and taking up for the civics.
Whats that tell ya? Tells me they're a closet ricer. haha. I on the other hand am a full flegged domestic guy. Im all about v8's and rwd. A purist of sorts.
08-23-2006, 12:24 AM
#24
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OC, Cali
Posts: 3,293
RE: new taillights for 94
I thought what made an SN95 5.0 wasn't the ugly tailights but the 5.0 part
ORIGINAL: 88stangaruu
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
ORIGINAL: MustangMan00
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
08-23-2006, 12:39 AM
#25
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,317
RE: new taillights for 94
ORIGINAL: PX429
I thought what made an SN95 5.0 wasn't the ugly tailights but the 5.0 part
I thought what made an SN95 5.0 wasn't the ugly tailights but the 5.0 part
ORIGINAL: 88stangaruu
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
ORIGINAL: MustangMan00
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
From 50yrds away what made them a 5.0 from just looking at them?
^^^Told ya i was gonna get flamed. [&:]
08-23-2006, 12:50 AM
#27
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OC, Cali
Posts: 3,293
RE: new taillights for 94
by the time I'm 50yd's in front of the other guy. He would know it was a 5.0
ORIGINAL: 88stangaruu
From 50yrds away what made them a 5.0 from just looking at them?
^^^Told ya i was gonna get flamed. [&:]
ORIGINAL: PX429
I thought what made an SN95 5.0 wasn't the ugly tailights but the 5.0 part
I thought what made an SN95 5.0 wasn't the ugly tailights but the 5.0 part
ORIGINAL: 88stangaruu
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
ORIGINAL: MustangMan00
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
From 50yrds away what made them a 5.0 from just looking at them?
^^^Told ya i was gonna get flamed. [&:]
08-23-2006, 12:56 AM
#28
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,317
RE: new taillights for 94
ORIGINAL: PX429
by the time I'm 50yd's in front of the other guy. He would know it was a 5.0
by the time I'm 50yd's in front of the other guy. He would know it was a 5.0
ORIGINAL: 88stangaruu
From 50yrds away what made them a 5.0 from just looking at them?
^^^Told ya i was gonna get flamed. [&:]
ORIGINAL: PX429
I thought what made an SN95 5.0 wasn't the ugly tailights but the 5.0 part
I thought what made an SN95 5.0 wasn't the ugly tailights but the 5.0 part
ORIGINAL: 88stangaruu
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
ORIGINAL: MustangMan00
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
of all of them out there...those are too bad, but i would never do that, i personally think the 94-95 lights should stay the same, thats what made them diff.
I agree totally. Its what makes the sn95 5.0 the 5.0 imo. Putting the 96-98 tailights takes the origionality of them out imo. I know im going to get flamed for that but i dont care.
From 50yrds away what made them a 5.0 from just looking at them?
^^^Told ya i was gonna get flamed. [&:]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post