Got new numbers guys!
10-14-2006, 10:28 PM
#1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hendersonville, NC
Posts: 541
Got new numbers guys!
Hey everybody. Went to the dyno today. It ran real good. I was really rich up top, a little lean down low, only had my timing set at 10*, and no SCT chip. She pulled 278 RWHP/316 RWTQ!! N/A. I thought that was great. Once the chip gets tuned and the car evens out on the air/fuel, I should make over 300 RWHP! I didn't spray it cause it was cold, and I fogot the bottle in the car. Also, I wasn't sure if my injectors would handle a 150 shot. I might have to switch to a wet kit. Once I go to the dyno in Connover on the 28th, I will spray it. Hes my tuning guy. the guys here are cool, but I used the other guy on the Chip the first time and trust him. Also because he has a Mustang dyno, not a chassis dyno. Its better tune for the track and street. I would have gotton a video, but my camera batteries died, and I didn't have others. DANG!!
10-15-2006, 05:51 PM
#3
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hendersonville, NC
Posts: 541
RE: Got new numbers guys!
I had been running the 150 dry, and it worked fine. I am afraid that my inj. won't be able to support it. So I want to look for a wet kit upgrade. But the plate for the TFS intakes are SO expensive! $258! I would love to do it that way. But I will have to see. Why you say I wouldn't want to run a 150 dry?
10-15-2006, 05:56 PM
#4
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,541
RE: Got new numbers guys!
ORIGINAL: XSRACINGGT
Hey everybody. Went to the dyno today. It ran real good. I was really rich up top, a little lean down low, only had my timing set at 10*, and no SCT chip. She pulled 278 RWHP/316 RWTQ!! N/A. I thought that was great. Once the chip gets tuned and the car evens out on the air/fuel, I should make over 300 RWHP! I didn't spray it cause it was cold, and I fogot the bottle in the car. Also, I wasn't sure if my injectors would handle a 150 shot. I might have to switch to a wet kit. Once I go to the dyno in Connover on the 28th, I will spray it. Hes my tuning guy. the guys here are cool, but I used the other guy on the Chip the first time and trust him. Also because he has a Mustang dyno, not a chassis dyno. Its better tune for the track and street. I would have gotton a video, but my camera batteries died, and I didn't have others. DANG!!
Hey everybody. Went to the dyno today. It ran real good. I was really rich up top, a little lean down low, only had my timing set at 10*, and no SCT chip. She pulled 278 RWHP/316 RWTQ!! N/A. I thought that was great. Once the chip gets tuned and the car evens out on the air/fuel, I should make over 300 RWHP! I didn't spray it cause it was cold, and I fogot the bottle in the car. Also, I wasn't sure if my injectors would handle a 150 shot. I might have to switch to a wet kit. Once I go to the dyno in Connover on the 28th, I will spray it. Hes my tuning guy. the guys here are cool, but I used the other guy on the Chip the first time and trust him. Also because he has a Mustang dyno, not a chassis dyno. Its better tune for the track and street. I would have gotton a video, but my camera batteries died, and I didn't have others. DANG!!
Okay WTF guys. THis guy made like 35whp more than me and he has way better heads and a better cam. So whats up with dissing my 244whp with GT40Ps and an alphabet cam? PS, he also has better air/fuel delivery because it can be tuned a bit better than carb. So come on...how do you figure 244 is low for me?
PS, GOOD DYNO RUNS!
10-15-2006, 06:06 PM
#5
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hendersonville, NC
Posts: 541
RE: Got new numbers guys!
Thanks Stanger. I never dissed you on your nums. I thought they were quite respectable. Carbs are hard to tune. I hate em. Fuel inj. is more costly to tune tho. so it has its ups and downs. I can't wait to get it totally tuned and maybe take it to the track once before it gets too cold up here.
10-15-2006, 06:09 PM
#6
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,541
RE: Got new numbers guys!
ORIGINAL: XSRACINGGT
Thanks Stanger. I never dissed you on your nums. I thought they were quite respectable. Carbs are hard to tune. I hate em. Fuel inj. is more costly to tune tho. so it has its ups and downs. I can't wait to get it totally tuned and maybe take it to the track once before it gets too cold up here.
Thanks Stanger. I never dissed you on your nums. I thought they were quite respectable. Carbs are hard to tune. I hate em. Fuel inj. is more costly to tune tho. so it has its ups and downs. I can't wait to get it totally tuned and maybe take it to the track once before it gets too cold up here.
10-15-2006, 06:16 PM
#7
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,092
RE: Got new numbers guys!
ORIGINAL: stanger88
Okay WTF guys. THis guy made like 35whp more than me and he has way better heads and a better cam. So whats up with dissing my 244whp with GT40Ps and an alphabet cam? PS, he also has better air/fuel delivery because it can be tuned a bit better than carb. So come on...how do you figure 244 is low for me?
PS, GOOD DYNO RUNS!
ORIGINAL: XSRACINGGT
Hey everybody. Went to the dyno today. It ran real good. I was really rich up top, a little lean down low, only had my timing set at 10*, and no SCT chip. She pulled 278 RWHP/316 RWTQ!! N/A. I thought that was great. Once the chip gets tuned and the car evens out on the air/fuel, I should make over 300 RWHP! I didn't spray it cause it was cold, and I fogot the bottle in the car. Also, I wasn't sure if my injectors would handle a 150 shot. I might have to switch to a wet kit. Once I go to the dyno in Connover on the 28th, I will spray it. Hes my tuning guy. the guys here are cool, but I used the other guy on the Chip the first time and trust him. Also because he has a Mustang dyno, not a chassis dyno. Its better tune for the track and street. I would have gotton a video, but my camera batteries died, and I didn't have others. DANG!!
Hey everybody. Went to the dyno today. It ran real good. I was really rich up top, a little lean down low, only had my timing set at 10*, and no SCT chip. She pulled 278 RWHP/316 RWTQ!! N/A. I thought that was great. Once the chip gets tuned and the car evens out on the air/fuel, I should make over 300 RWHP! I didn't spray it cause it was cold, and I fogot the bottle in the car. Also, I wasn't sure if my injectors would handle a 150 shot. I might have to switch to a wet kit. Once I go to the dyno in Connover on the 28th, I will spray it. Hes my tuning guy. the guys here are cool, but I used the other guy on the Chip the first time and trust him. Also because he has a Mustang dyno, not a chassis dyno. Its better tune for the track and street. I would have gotton a video, but my camera batteries died, and I didn't have others. DANG!!
Okay WTF guys. THis guy made like 35whp more than me and he has way better heads and a better cam. So whats up with dissing my 244whp with GT40Ps and an alphabet cam? PS, he also has better air/fuel delivery because it can be tuned a bit better than carb. So come on...how do you figure 244 is low for me?
PS, GOOD DYNO RUNS!
I made 278 rwhp with GT40s and an E cam...
10-15-2006, 06:29 PM
#9
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 3,311
RE: Got new numbers guys!
XSRACINGGT, What are all your mods ? Nice #'s by the way, i'm shootin for around 280 rwhp, i think i'll be close.
EDIT: nevermind, somehow i didnt read your sig in your org. post. HAHA, i'm dumb
EDIT: nevermind, somehow i didnt read your sig in your org. post. HAHA, i'm dumb
10-15-2006, 06:30 PM
#10
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,541
RE: Got new numbers guys!
ORIGINAL: FordMustangXBA
I made 278 rwhp with GT40s and an E cam...
ORIGINAL: stanger88
Okay WTF guys. THis guy made like 35whp more than me and he has way better heads and a better cam. So whats up with dissing my 244whp with GT40Ps and an alphabet cam? PS, he also has better air/fuel delivery because it can be tuned a bit better than carb. So come on...how do you figure 244 is low for me?
PS, GOOD DYNO RUNS!
ORIGINAL: XSRACINGGT
Hey everybody. Went to the dyno today. It ran real good. I was really rich up top, a little lean down low, only had my timing set at 10*, and no SCT chip. She pulled 278 RWHP/316 RWTQ!! N/A. I thought that was great. Once the chip gets tuned and the car evens out on the air/fuel, I should make over 300 RWHP! I didn't spray it cause it was cold, and I fogot the bottle in the car. Also, I wasn't sure if my injectors would handle a 150 shot. I might have to switch to a wet kit. Once I go to the dyno in Connover on the 28th, I will spray it. Hes my tuning guy. the guys here are cool, but I used the other guy on the Chip the first time and trust him. Also because he has a Mustang dyno, not a chassis dyno. Its better tune for the track and street. I would have gotton a video, but my camera batteries died, and I didn't have others. DANG!!
Hey everybody. Went to the dyno today. It ran real good. I was really rich up top, a little lean down low, only had my timing set at 10*, and no SCT chip. She pulled 278 RWHP/316 RWTQ!! N/A. I thought that was great. Once the chip gets tuned and the car evens out on the air/fuel, I should make over 300 RWHP! I didn't spray it cause it was cold, and I fogot the bottle in the car. Also, I wasn't sure if my injectors would handle a 150 shot. I might have to switch to a wet kit. Once I go to the dyno in Connover on the 28th, I will spray it. Hes my tuning guy. the guys here are cool, but I used the other guy on the Chip the first time and trust him. Also because he has a Mustang dyno, not a chassis dyno. Its better tune for the track and street. I would have gotton a video, but my camera batteries died, and I didn't have others. DANG!!
Okay WTF guys. THis guy made like 35whp more than me and he has way better heads and a better cam. So whats up with dissing my 244whp with GT40Ps and an alphabet cam? PS, he also has better air/fuel delivery because it can be tuned a bit better than carb. So come on...how do you figure 244 is low for me?
PS, GOOD DYNO RUNS!
I made 278 rwhp with GT40s and an E cam...
i guess tfs's are a waste then.