5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

wtfs it take to hit 13s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2006, 12:00 AM
  #81  
Highplanezdrifter
1st Gear Member
 
Highplanezdrifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
Default RE: .

crazyhorse, my 60' time was at 2.60 and i was running through the traps at 96 mph. combo of ****ty tires and a badly prepped track, lol.
Highplanezdrifter is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 08:04 AM
  #82  
HC_CrAzYHoRsE
Super Moderator
 
HC_CrAzYHoRsE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 8,401
Default RE: .

ORIGINAL: Highplanezdrifter

crazyhorse, my 60' time was at 2.60 and i was running through the traps at 96 mph. combo of ****ty tires and a badly prepped track, lol.
HOLY! [] ...that is officially the worst 60ft i have ever seen... no offense
HC_CrAzYHoRsE is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 10:09 AM
  #83  
4fit?
4th Gear Member
 
4fit?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Graham, NC
Posts: 1,472
Default RE: .

ORIGINAL: Highplanezdrifter

crazyhorse, my 60' time was at 2.60 and i was running through the traps at 96 mph. combo of ****ty tires and a badly prepped track, lol.
eewwww.... MPH was so high because you were spinning. I've trapped 89.xx in the 1/8th but ony ran a 8.4x. The 89 is good for 7.70s or so. [&:]
4fit? is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 11:46 PM
  #84  
Highplanezdrifter
1st Gear Member
 
Highplanezdrifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
Default RE: .

haha, you're not even kidding dude! the 60 ft. never got any better. this car has plenty of potential but NO traction whatsoever! i'm not exactly new to having a quick car, just gotta get this one sticking! lol, at least i'm not worried about traction in my pro street car, haha.
Highplanezdrifter is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 11:47 PM
  #85  
dimebag
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dimebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earleville md
Posts: 10,357
Default RE: .

... time for some DRs, lol^^^
dimebag is offline  
Old 10-19-2006, 11:49 PM
  #86  
PRO50SC
The Rogue Mod
 
PRO50SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland Sucka's!!
Posts: 21,918
Default RE: .

Not sure but I'll let ya know when I get there!!
PRO50SC is offline  
Old 10-20-2006, 12:04 AM
  #87  
brando5.0
1st Gear Member
 
brando5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 141
Default RE: .

I think I've got about the worst 60 foot times- I pulled a 3.4 60' last weekend. I was the second person to run on a track that was about 35*. Once it warmed up a little, I was able to pull a 13.998 off on my mods listed below, as well as a set of slicks. BTW- I'm desperately in need of a tune- this motor doesn't like the cam with a stock computer

Also, as far as suspension, I wouldn't worry about changing it all out. The same goes for the rear diff. A guy I race with dumps his from 5000 rpms on drag slicks every race. In the last 2 years of racing every other weekend, he has snapped 2 axles, but if you dump from a modest 3 grand or so, you won't have much to worry about.

Also, another thing I think everyone is missing---where are you racing at? If you're racing in Denver on a hot summer day its a heck of a lot different outcome compared to Utah on a cool morning. If you look around, you can find calculators that will convert your timeslip, given your track altitude and conditons, to that of a good day at sea level.

Just my $.02
brando5.0 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
MustangForums Editor
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
1
09-30-2015 12:39 PM
wraith777
General Tech
1
09-28-2015 10:49 AM
humpbackshooter
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
2
09-24-2015 10:07 AM



Quick Reply: wtfs it take to hit 13s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.