302-stroker vs. supercharger - MustangForums.com

Go Back  MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
Reload this Page >

302-stroker vs. supercharger

Notices
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

302-stroker vs. supercharger

Reply

 
 
 
Old 10-24-2006, 09:35 PM
  #1  
88blackwidowgt
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 6
Default 302-stroker vs. supercharger

I have a 88 gt that has trickflow manifold and i was about to order heads and i wondering if i should go with trick flow twisted wedge heads or afr heads and which would be better mathed doing the heads and stroking it to a 347 or just putting the heads on it and putting on a supercharger
thanks in advance
88blackwidowgt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:53 PM
  #2  
samseed101
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,693
Default RE: 302-stroker vs. supercharger


ORIGINAL: 88blackwidowgt

I have a 88 gt that has trickflow manifold and i was about to order heads and i wondering if i should go with trick flow twisted wedge heads or afr heads and which would be better mathed doing the heads and stroking it to a 347 or just putting the heads on it and putting on a supercharger
thanks in advance
Why not do both? a 347 and a S/C would be a great combo

Personally, I LOVE trickflow, but I also have to admit that AFR's kick ****. If I was just going to get heads and leave the intake and cam alone, then I'd go with AFR. If I was doing a complete H/C/I then I would go with the Trick Flow Twisted Wedge setup.
samseed101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:59 PM
  #3  
88blackwidowgt
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 6
Default RE: 302-stroker vs. supercharger

i'm going to leave my trick flow mainifold in so should i match the heads, and i don't have enough money so should i stroke it or super charge
thanks
88blackwidowgt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 10:11 PM
  #4  
rcdblink716
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 585
Default RE: 302-stroker vs. supercharger

stroke it, it's nice to have all that power all the way through the powerband instead of waiting to build boost. Just my .02
rcdblink716 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 11:57 PM
  #5  
OneFine89Mustang
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,410
Default RE: 302-stroker vs. supercharger

go with the trickflow heads
OneFine89Mustang is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
11
03-12-2018 05:16 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 10:21 AM
col2560
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
3
09-25-2015 09:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 302-stroker vs. supercharger


Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.