are 89 LX's the least available stangs?
11-17-2006, 11:17 PM
#11
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,116
RE: are 89 LX's the least available stangs?
faster...
no one hasa stock mustang anymore..I like have a tilt wheel..never use it,no air bags,and no dead pedal, oh and no ugly *** steering wheel but most of all is I hate those pouch side panels
no one hasa stock mustang anymore..I like have a tilt wheel..never use it,no air bags,and no dead pedal, oh and no ugly *** steering wheel but most of all is I hate those pouch side panels
11-17-2006, 11:23 PM
#12
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 491
RE: are 89 LX's the least available stangs?
I have to agree 89' is the nicest year (for GT's) only becuase you don't have to do a MAF conversion... but for LX's i'd take a 92 and only a 92. Gotta have the painted moldings.
11-18-2006, 03:45 AM
#14
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,292
RE: are 89 LX's the least available stangs?
AMEN!!!!!
ORIGINAL: 2 kwik
faster... no one hasa stock mustang anymore..I like have a tilt wheel..never use it,no air bags,and no dead pedal, oh and no ugly *** steering wheel but most of all is I hate those pouch side panels
faster...
no one hasa stock mustang anymore..I like have a tilt wheel..never use it,no air bags,and no dead pedal, oh and no ugly *** steering wheel but most of all is I hate those pouch side panels
11-18-2006, 03:49 AM
#15
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
RE: are 89 LX's the least available stangs?
I have to agree 89' is the nicest year (for GT's) only becuase you don't have to do a MAF conversion
11-18-2006, 04:26 AM
#16
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 8,401
RE: are 89 LX's the least available stangs?
ORIGINAL: vt89gtvert
AMEN!!!!!
AMEN!!!!!
ORIGINAL: 2 kwik
faster... no one hasa stock mustang anymore..I like have a tilt wheel..never use it,no air bags,and no dead pedal, oh and no ugly *** steering wheel but most of all is I hate those pouch side panels
faster...
no one hasa stock mustang anymore..I like have a tilt wheel..never use it,no air bags,and no dead pedal, oh and no ugly *** steering wheel but most of all is I hate those pouch side panels
11-18-2006, 01:35 PM
#17
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
RE: are 89 LX's the least available stangs?
nope no proof on the '89 being faster
just comparing my cars to each other. and everyone else i know who had an '89 and also a newer one.
my '89 ran 13.20's on motor , and my '93 runs 14.00 on motor w/ the same mods , my '88 was a mass air cali car and ran 14.20's 100% bone stock , 2.73's and street tires in 90* weather, i only had it about 4 months so it never got modded.
all were bone stock when i got them, both have 4.10's and mickeys , long tubes etc
the '89 of mine was a little lighter from being a manual options car and the '93 is all power, but that doesn't account for 800 lbs of added weight as the ET would show. my '89 also had convo pros and skinnys up front, but again, not that much of a diff should be seen, yes they were both 5-speeds
what is a fact is that '87-'89 had a better cam than the rest , but ford claims only 5-10 hp different
no proof, just an observation , but i'm convinced
just comparing my cars to each other. and everyone else i know who had an '89 and also a newer one.
my '89 ran 13.20's on motor , and my '93 runs 14.00 on motor w/ the same mods , my '88 was a mass air cali car and ran 14.20's 100% bone stock , 2.73's and street tires in 90* weather, i only had it about 4 months so it never got modded.
all were bone stock when i got them, both have 4.10's and mickeys , long tubes etc
the '89 of mine was a little lighter from being a manual options car and the '93 is all power, but that doesn't account for 800 lbs of added weight as the ET would show. my '89 also had convo pros and skinnys up front, but again, not that much of a diff should be seen, yes they were both 5-speeds
what is a fact is that '87-'89 had a better cam than the rest , but ford claims only 5-10 hp different
no proof, just an observation , but i'm convinced
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
