91' Camaro RS

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-04-2004, 04:08 AM

#11

offnet83

2nd Gear Member

Join Date: Mar 2004

Location:

Posts: 240

RE: 91' Camaro RS

back in highschool i had a 91 rs with the 305 and it ran like crap 1/4 ur lookin at probably mid to high 16's depening on auto or manual

09-04-2004, 04:20 AM

#12

USAMuscle

4th Gear Member

Join Date: Sep 2003

Location: United States

Posts: 1,404

RE: 91' Camaro RS

Quote:

ORIGINAL: blown87Gt

THEY ARE PRETTY WEAK DUDE ITS A CHEVY

Tell that to the guys driving an LS1. Every maker has crap cars at one time or another. Look at the Mustang II.

09-04-2004, 04:27 AM

#13

Guest

Posts: n/a

RE: 91' Camaro RS

Quote:

ORIGINAL: LOVEMY88GT

I was going to get a 98 Trans Am but i tryed a 88 GT and i thought it had more ***** and it was a hell of alot cheaper and you have more to do with these engines for the money. VERY EXPENSIVE TO MOD CHEVY VEICHLES!!!

of course it was cheaper, it was 10 years older...

but you seriously think your 88 GT was more powerful than a 98 TA with an LS1???

09-04-2004, 03:27 PM

#14

USAMuscle

4th Gear Member

Join Date: Sep 2003

Location: United States

Posts: 1,404

RE: 91' Camaro RS

Quote:

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

of course it was cheaper, it was 10 years older...

but you seriously think your 88 GT was more powerful than a 98 TA with an LS1???

Maybe if it had a sh|tload of mods to boot.

09-04-2004, 03:53 PM

#15

90Mustangfan

I ♥ Acer

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location:

Posts: 1,259

RE: 91' Camaro RS

ill tell you those LS1's are nice, but anythig above a 98' is way too expenxive,they go for around 12,000$ or more, I paid 2800 for my car and its just as fast. I would love to get a camaro SS, but they are way too costly, mabye thats why they discontinued them,mustangs are cheaper and just as fast.